politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Why are we waiting for the supreme court on any of this when Biden controls all the guys with guns??
If he's actually committed to any of this he should just send them in and throw the robes out, and fill it up with people who aren't demons.
So you're saying that Biden should stop SCOTUS shielding Trump from the consequences of trying to make the US a dictatorship by checks notes turning the US into a dictatorship.🤦
good luck in November lol
edit: Democracy is when corporations own all candidates and the electoral college designed by slaveowners almost 300 years ago decides all presidential elections.
I'm not saying that the US system from the 1700s works in 2024. I'm saying that your suggestion would make it even worse than it already is.
The current situation is that the Democrats are completely unreachable on the issue of "stop arming a genocide", but then somehow this is a bridge too far
Yeah, turning the US into a military dictatorship wouldn't do anything to stop them from continuing to supply the genocide and I really don't see how you'd ever think so..
I've been told by numerous Democrats that I should be voting for them despite their complicity in the genocide of the Palestinian people, because of all the things they're getting done. They could literally get anything they want done to protect abortion and LGBT people and they choose not to, while the genocide continues anyways.
You've been told that the GOP will accelerate and increase the suffering of the Palestinian people. This remains to be true. If you're voting only on that issue the Democratic Party is the best choice for preventing more death and destruction in Gaza. If you have an argument for how the GOP will improve the situation in Gaza I'm all ears, but I'm pretty certain you don't.
Biden and a good chunk of the Democrats are wrong on how we are handling the crisis in Gaza. They are also our best shot at helping the Palestinian people (electorally). Both things can be true simultaneously.
This is literally just good cop/bad cop where the assertion that the good cop is 'better' is just some guys telling me 'trust me bro the other guys worse' despite his far lower body count
Okay but in your scenario the problem is the "good cop" is actually the same as the "bad cop". Are you arguing that Biden and Trump are equal? What leads you to that conclusion?
If we had evidence the "good cop" would lead to better results or that working with the "bad cop" leads to worse results, and we had to work with one of the cops regardless, it would make perfect sense to work with the good one.
If you think saying Trump would be worse than Biden is the equivalent of "trust me bro" there's really no helping you. We just have to explain to everyone else how ridiculous that is given the literal mountains of evidence to the contrary.
Again, I would like actual reasoning how Trump being elected helps the Palestinians. I'm not saying Biden or the Democrats are right on the issue, I would argue the opposite. I just want to know how they aren't the best option we have right now when compared to the GOP. Anytime now.
Not voting for the genocide, if it's such a problem they should change their behavior. They clearly don't care about my vote so why should I bother participating?
If you are not participating in the system, your opinion of the system is moot.
They already don't care about my opinion when I do participate!
Democracy is when every candidate is corporate owned and the vote is decided by process designed by slaveowners 300 years ago to specifically suppress the popular vote.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Yeah, yeah, sorry, I've just seen this comment copy\pasted so much its hard to take out seriously... Are you real? Say potato! Say potato, viking_hippie
Tomato.
Touche'
No, your right in this case. I think it would be unwise to just let the fascists win. You beat fascists by kicking their teeth in.
Suddenly violent insurrection is A-OK! 🙄
I've been internally consistent on that one, I'm always calling for violent insurrection
Not guns. Biden can appoint 10 new judges and then have them rule that their appointment was lawful. Why should a country of hundreds of millions have only 9 people at the head of a whole branch of government, anyway?
We should just make every American a member of the supreme court tbh.
That would probably collapse the US
I fully support it, but Democrats want to keep this shithole from falling apart.
By their own inaction on internal social issues coupled with unlimited support for proxy wars it's going to happen anyways, might as well get in some W's for the rest of us before it all goes down in flames.
I think they're old enough that they want to delay the inevitable until they're dead and gone. They don't really care about the rest of us, just themselves.
Welcome to politics!
Politics = kick the can as far as possible down the road until it becomes the next persons problem. They then follow the tradition.
Why go against tradition?! You're ruining our can kicking heritage!
Hard agree, it's vexing getting shamed for voting of all things when these people have actual power.