this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
13 points (93.3% liked)

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6590 readers
1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Last night, I watched ‘The Conners’ (it's on after Jeopardy here, and it's not so bad now that Barr is gone), and I can't stop thinking about it. Hopefully, you saw it, too, but it was bothersome. It started with a 90+ YO woman getting her identity stolen. Fair enough. Then, the family thought that debit would be their issue and staged an “intervention.” This is where I think TV needs to be more educational and should have explained that no, they were not going to “be left with a mountain of debt.” Instead, they find out she wasn't being defrauded and had made the purchases herself. Here is where it jumped the shark. This gave them the idea, from experience with Rosanne's death, that credit card debt usually gets wiped when someone dies. They go on a fraudulent spending spree, and near the end of the episode, they find out the credit company will investigate the issue.

I guess my point for the conversation is that there are so many tucking crazy loopholes in this episode it was almost anti-educational and pushed an agenda with no reason. I understand a lot of scripted shows are like this, such as Law and Order (except the original, sort of), but this seemed over the top.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I'm not the best at understanding economics or economic law and I myself couldn't tell if legitimate concepts were going over my head or if they weren't all that well-standing. What struck me the most is they couldn't just talk with her normally about it if there was an issue. All of Chuck Lorre's characters these days feel like they try too hard to be eventful.