Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54443 readers

161 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

408

Italy’s new Piracy Shield has just gone into operation and is already harming human rights there (walledculture.org)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you, but still the portuguese law is equally a violation of the EU human rights agreement.

[+] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Kind of, the law doesn’t actually say that it only applies to ISPs… technically speaking the Portuguese law could be applicable and enforced with a VPN provider is a court decided to do so. The legislation is kind of written in a vague way that may apply to more than just ISPs. So far they only pressured ISPs to block websites.

[+] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

but the processes are so fucking long that getting something blocked takes time, our ISPs fight almost every time (...) The only actual option to get something out of the internet is to find the server and shut it down.

Not the case at all around here (Portugal), the blocks are quick and ISPs don't even complain, they simply comply. What the law says is that there's a govt entity called IGAC that is allowed to ask ISPs to block a website (domain name) as long as the website is flagged as containing / hosting piracy or other form of copyright infringement. The only requirement is that IGAC has to notify the website owner asking to remove the content prior blocking. After 48 if the website is still hosting said content then IGAC will ask the ISPs to block it.

Since this is all DNS based one can, obviously, set their DNS servers as Google or Cloudflare and bypass the block. Now the problem is that this is all fun and games until someone in the govt decides to go against Cloudflare and other DNS providers, the law would allow them to easily do it the way its written.