this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
1480 points (95.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

18969 readers
1274 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

4 pane comic of dolan on the left and spooderman on the right

pane 1 (dolan): cum join opensurce cummunity!
pane 2 (spooderman): shure! how joyn?
pane 3 (dolan): Here discord! (with discord logo)
pane 4 (spooderman with tears in eyes): y u do dis?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 300 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)
  • Terrible format for archiving knowledge
  • Terrible tool for retrieving knowledge
  • Locks community access behind a corporate license agreement
  • Hands control of community-created content to a corporation
  • Prevents indexing by web search engines
  • Antithetical to interoperability
  • Privacy-hostile

A web forum is far better in most cases. If you can't manage to run your own, there are plenty of lemmy servers that will do it for you. Even an email list (with searchable archives) would be better than Discord.

If you have collaborative documents that outgrow the forum format, use a wiki.

If real-time chat is needed, irc or matrix.

A project hosting its community on Discord is a project that won't get my contributions.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I recently went through these exact pains trying to contribute to a project that exclusively ran through Discord and eventually had to give up when it was clear they would never enable issues in their GitHub repos for "reasons."

It was impossible to discover the history behind anything. Even current information was lost within days, having to rehash aspects that were already investigated and decided upon.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago

would never enable issues in their Git...

That's a worrying sign for a project.

Did you clone their Git and start tracking issues there? ;-)

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

It's the "see no evil" approach. If you didn't report the issue while the admin was online, then they aren't compelled to do anything about it. Convenient for the project maintainer who doesn't actually like maintaining things. Awful for the rest of us.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A web forum is far better in most cases

It's sad when a web forum is better than the tool you're considering. Bumps, aggressive garbage collection, no Resurrection, it's weird.

I'm old, I guess. I miss NNTP, mainly for the archived posts I could discuss with the authors for an updated take or revised solution or some clarification. And yes, I know there's a good webUI front-end for an NNTP server as a back-end. ;-)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

On the bright side:

Aggressive garbage collection and automatic thread locking are optional settings in most web forum software I've seen.

Lemmy shares some of the important parts of Usenet, and could develop into something that comes close.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Perfectly summarized and the stance everyone should take for the wellbeing of any community. Look at cs.rin.ru for example.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Lemmy also doesn't get indexed by web search engines. I have yet to find a single post from lemmy on google or DDG even when specifically searching

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

What do you mean by specifically searching? Because it totally comes up for me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Ooh! A post with claims backed by evidence!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

That's most likely due to low rankings. Lemmy doesn't prevent it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I've had Lemmy post first result in Google idk what your doing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Use "site:lemmy.world" (for example) at the end of your search