this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
970 points (96.9% liked)

World News

38278 readers
2355 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- People who act shocked that a priest would bless a gay couple but have no problem with him blessing a crooked businessman are hypocrites, Pope Francis said.

“The most serious sins are those that are disguised with a more ‘angelic’ appearance. No one is scandalized if I give a blessing to an entrepreneur who perhaps exploits people, which is a very serious sin. Whereas they are scandalized if I give it to a homosexual -- this is hypocrisy,” he told the Italian magazine Credere.

The interview was scheduled for publication Feb. 8, but Vatican News reported on some of its content the day before when the magazine issued a press release about the interview.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

People who act shocked that a priest would bless a gay couple but have no problem with him blessing a crooked businessman are hypocrites, Pope Francis said.

Did something come up about priests blessing crooked businessmen, or is he just speaking in general terms?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Well, in the Bible, I know there were at least a few stories where Jesus didn't take too kindly to what would be a modern day businessman.

The one where Jesus goes into a rage because a bunch of merchants set up shop in the courtyard(? Or maybe they took over the whole temple? Idk it's been awhile) of a temple comes to mind

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

They aren’t merchants they’re moneychangers, ie loan sharks

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.

James 5:1-6 has a lot to say of the rich, too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

This is a warning not a condemnation. As Jesus also says “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven”.

Basically it means when you’re wealthy, it’s very hard to find a good reason to expand beyond suffering. You can just another line of coke or throw another party or go on another vacation and so you’re never forced to find the real solution to suffering.

Basically infinite medicine for the symptoms prevents the process of digging deeper to find a cure. And the digging deeper is quite painful, so it’s not the kind of thing someone does unless they’re desperate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Well, in the Bible, I know there were at least a few stories where Jesus didn’t take too kindly to what would be a modern day businessman.

What I meant was "Did he choose that example because of some current event?" I wasn't questioning whether members of the church should be upset about priests blessing crooks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It could just be the nature of not necessarily being able to see one's business corruption nor there being a test for it. Yet a homosexual couple can't exactly hide that fact. Just my guess (I didn't read the article).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

OK, thanks for your pov.