this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
148 points (80.6% liked)

Nuclear

329 readers
1 users here now

Focus on peaceful use of nuclear energy tech, economics, news, and climate change.

From r/nuclear

Looking for moderators

Useful links:

IAEA PRIS - The Database on Nuclear Power Reactors: https://pris.iaea.org/pris/home.aspx

NRC US reactor status: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/reactor-status/index.html

US Nuclear Plant Outage Status: https://www.eia.gov/nuclear/outages/

Milestones in Advanced Nuclear: https://www.airtable.com/universe/expnrIMohdf6dIvZl/milestones-in-advanced-nuclear

What about the waste? http://whataboutthewaste.com/

What about the cost? https://zionlights.substack.com/p/what-is-the-true-cost-of-energy

How long will nuclear fuel last? https://whatisnuclear.com/blog/2020-10-28-nuclear-energy-is-longterm-sustainable.html

Global Energy Footprint https://energy.glex.no/footprint/

Low Carbon Power Nuclear page: https://lowcarbonpower.org/type/nuclear

IAEA PRIS - Under Construction Reactors: https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/WorldStatistics/UnderConstructionReactorsByCountry.aspx

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZombiFrancis 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Basing on the US since that is where my MS studies in environment policy were focused. Conservative republicanans poll highest in believing climate change is fake or not caused by human activity

From the same article, you can see that support for expanding nuclear energy is stronger among liberal republicans and strongest with conservative republicans.

*Pew research is not a scholarly source on its own, but scores center for media bias making it optimal for readers without academic library access

[–] ZombiFrancis 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oil and gas companies being in an 'alliance' with climate change activists is a pretty made up notion, even in the context of constraining the entire scope to just a stance on nuclear energy.

There may be opposition to nuclear but to make the bridge over to being an ally of oil and coal would be... well, stonetoss level of improper framing of an issue.

Hell, anecdotally speaking for my own experiences on the topic: nuclear energy has been the most consistent common ground between climate change activists and deniers that I've seen. Far more than the precise zero climate change activists ive seen actively supporting oil, gas, or coal interests. There is support renewables, not obliquely opposing nuclear.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Ah, okay. Absolutely valid point. 'Alliance' is not a good choice of words here. Germany's green anti-nuclear party inadvertently jumping into bed with coal and natural gas was not an alliance, just a circumstance.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think the alliance refers to advocates replacing nuclear power with fossil fuels. A situation where the results are less important than the opposition to nuclear power.