Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
It's very telling that most of the articles you post are from notthebee.com.
Try living in the real world some time.
kek
Zombie, do you have anything to add? Like maybe how reliable notthebee is, hell even an example of notthebee lying for extra points.
Please remember that this sub is about discussing right wing stories.
I have nothing to say to you.
You've proven time and again to be a dishonest interlocutor.
U mad bro?
You can just say person, or commenter or debater if you want to be specific. Using fancy words for the sake of fancy words does nothing but make you look pretentious and make the conversation harder to follow.
I don't want to have a conversation with you, so why would I care?
I will not be responding to you again.
Funny that you think using philosophy 101 words makes me pretentious though. Hilarious.
Why use fancy words when simple words better? /s
How many people do you honestly think took that specific college course?
Not The Bee regularly posts properly sourced highly factual articles that are heavily biased towards the right.
Fox News, OAN and NewsMax could all take a page from NTB's book because those three fail fact checks regularly.
Fox News has pay walls, not the bee doesn't and has mostly the same info. It's basically the same thing as wapo or commondreams or salon, just from the other side of aisle.
[email protected] has those as sources right now.
Fox News is garbage, too. They have been shown to be proven liars in court multiple times.
Who took the Washington Post to court for defamation and won a record-setting judgement? Fox defames people and institutions as a matter of course.
Politics has those bad commentary sites (which I would prefer they didn't), but there are actual news sources posted there.
All I see here is commentary from people who are motivated to enrage conservatives based on spurious reasoning and culture war bullshit.
Among other stupid things it says, let's focus on this one:
When have Texas judges ever had a say in immigration cases?
Like I said: this is just bait to piss off conservatives for outrage clicks.
So why would you trust a site who employs a writer and editor who believe otherwise? This is an extremely basic principle of federalism.
It only makes sense if the site is used to piss off conservatives and get those clicks. They know they're lying.
That doesn't answer my question at all, and in fact makes it worse. All of their articles are opinion pieces, and the fact that every second article here is one of theirs is absurd unless the point is to piss off conservatives with spurious reasoning and culture war bullshit.