this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
262 points (89.0% liked)

World News

38237 readers
2651 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

That sure will encourage work on environmental issues. /s

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (56 children)

It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore. This IS a legitimate form of protest. They didn't do any harm and brought attention to their cause.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They weren't doing it for the climate crisis.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah the article is a bit strange. They call them environmental protesters but they seem to have been protesting food insecurity. Which I guess can be considered environmental but isn't usually what I think of.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Especially when you consider the famines that yhe climate crisis will cause. And yeah that's piss poor reporting, they call them environmental Protesters multiple times...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I think that's fine. Unless we're talking about greenhouses or urban indoor gardening, food grows in the environment. If you want to protect the food, you implicitly have to protect the environment, which makes you an environmentalist driven by food. There are lots of hazards which have little to do with climate (or at least which also have other, climate-unrelated causes), which can affect food. Invasive species, plastic, overfertilization, corporations, general socioeconomic disparities, just to name a few.

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (19 children)

Name a better form of protest to get the people's attention.
Spoiler: They've tried that before.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Funnily enough this has been the most successful form of environmental activism to this day

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Successful in pissing off the general public and causing them to ignore anything of substance that you have to say, sure. Pushing people away from your cause is not a good strategy if you want to effect change.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Literally killing yourself to protest climate change has barely made the news so yea, for some reason people only talk about it if you throw soup at glass in front of art for some reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hey guys science says our plant is heating up due to carbon emissions we are creating by burning fossil fuels. Can we tone it down a bit?

No

Hey guys going to chain myself outside, because this is super important

Don't care

Hey guys, going to burn myself alive to protest climate change

Meh

Soups and super glue on art!

Oh the humanity! Why would you not engage with us in simple conversation before chucking a cream of tomato onto bulletproof glass!?

Wait..... THAT'S WHAT GOT YOUR ATTENTION?!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

People were talking about climate change though. Movements like FFF (until Covid took the wind right out of their sails) had quite a bit of momentum, and actually were making it a mainstream topic.

Protests like this are getting people to talk about what you did, not about why you did it.

[–] starman2112 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean it has us talking about why they did it, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

We're not the people they need to reach though. I don't think either of us needs convincing that urgent action is needed on climate change, it's our boomer parents, coworkers, etc. who need convincing. And if someone's attempt at helping with that ends up making climate activists look like deranged vandals then please for the love of God stop trying to help.

load more comments (2 replies)