this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
-7 points (29.4% liked)

Conservative

479 readers
144 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
 

Remember, the government are not your friends. I think both the lefties and the righties can agree on that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t agree with the notion of pre-crime or collective punishment

Keeping an eye out for potential criminals isn't either of those things.

They didn’t do anything, literally just alleged crime-think. That’s not an attack, not technically or in spirit. It should not be counted.

It wasn't just a thought. It was a criminal planning to do another crime. He was planning on killing the people investigating him. I have no sympathy for criminals who plan on doing more crime, making credible threats and plans to kill people. He can get fucked for all I care.

If you think that solicitation to commit a violent crime and threatening an officer of the law isn't criminal, then you should take it up with the legislature.

Not all terrorism is physical. Not all violence is physical. So your statements saying he didn't do anything are just plain wrong. He was already a criminal when he was making these plans, so his threats and plans were credible. So the government took action, as they should.


Even at best, all you're arguing is that they are mischaracterizing the nature of what's going on. But regardless of how you categorize it, domestic right wing terrorism is the biggest terrorism threat to the U.S.

The government trying to keep an eye on it is for the better.