this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
313 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39165 readers
2622 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

If you are, what do you have against warrants? If someone kidnapped your friend and kept them locked away in their house. Don't you want there to be a way for the police to legally rescue your friend if they have evidence on where they are being held?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

because warrant or not, no one should have the power to remotely turn on your camera/mic/etc without your knowledge and monitor it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For me it's mostly against judges. Like judges that decide that because the victim of a rape doesn't remember the rape (because it was so horrible her brain blocked it out), the perpetrator should be free.

Or those judges that decide that there's not enough proof that a billionaire-owned chemical factory polluted a river that most of the fish died, even though there's only one chemical factory on the river that could have done it.

(Those both are local issues you probably haven't heard of, though I believe you've probably heard about many such cases)

Would you want any of those judges give a warrant to someone to spy on you?