this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
502 points (96.8% liked)

Funny

6895 readers
986 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ricecake 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Putting on my empathy hat here: if someone has done something to hurt you, like infidelity, you likely care about them. That feeling doesn't just turn off when they hurt you, you just get extra feelings that suck because of those feelings.

Attempting to force contrition or at least acknowledgement is a way to try to lessen those feelings. To go from "I care about this person and they hurt me", to "I care about this person, they hurt me, but they said they shouldn't have, or at least admit that they did".

Feelings are more complex than strictly rational. It can be impossible to stop caring about someone even if you now hate them, which means that unfortunately someone you now have an accutely hostile relationship with can be uniquely positioned to alleviate an aspect of your pain.

Given that, the rational (or at least easiest and most straightforward) thing to do is to build the most compelling case you can to hopefully force them to give you relief, or at least get the catharsis of proving to yourself that they're pathological, which is it's own form of closure.

Saying fuck it is obviously preferable, but it might not be the hand everyone is dealt.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

I replied with a bit more context to a different comment but the TL;DR is that confrontation is a gamble. It could pay off with some of that healthy closure, or it could go the other way. I've taken each route and found the "closure" route was only marginally less sucky than the move on route, but the failed confrontation was many times worse.