this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
117 points (88.7% liked)

Asklemmy

44140 readers
1078 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's a great question, thank you! It made me dick (edit: standing by my mistake!) a (tiny) bit deeper. I took a different perspective and the tldr is: Do you want to kill specifics? I.e. local plants, animals, water poisoning, etc - then mercury is the winner!

If you're after killing via global temperature variation then the car is.... Well... Killing it.

But on a serious note: both are bad but depending on how your local trash is handled those small bulbs could actually have an impact, most likely via the water chain.

If those are the two options I had I would just store them like OP. But then again where I live most shops take those back to recycle them properly.

Thanks again for the question, I had a fun few minutes!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope that second sentence was a typo…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why? If I want to learn the impact I try to understand the intention I would need - it's (intended to be) written from that point of view.

Now if I don't want it I know what not to do - plus the implications.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Dicking deeper means something entirely different from digging deeper.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You typed “dick deeper” I think you meant “dig deeper” 😂

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh. Ohhhhh. I'll leave that in there for others to laugh at!

And thanks for pointing it out I completely missed your point!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I love leaving mistakes for others to laugh at.