this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
270 points (99.3% liked)

World News

38914 readers
2184 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 768 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why is the US even necessary for this convo

Cold War got more complicated, economies got more complicated, US defense is somewhat materially dependent on various regions, including Europe.

Also, NATO exists and depends on US engagement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I just mean, theres all this drama about what if the Congressional Republicans screw Ukraine, and its like, the EU's GDP is way higher and the US is always complaining about them shirking their 2% committments they all agreed to. Why not get everyone paid up towards this effort, especially since its in their own side yard?

If the US fails to get it done, Europe and the rest of NATO need to step up and do the right thing. It shouldn't matter if the US gets bogged down in its own ridiculous internal politics, Europe needs to stop playing poor and open their very dusty checkbooks, including fucking Hungary and Turkey (but i'm not that naïve)

Downvote away, thoughful downvoters

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The USA's GDP is larger than the EU's, but the EU has given more to Ukraine than America has. That's without including contributions by individual nations in the EU or contributions by non-EU European countries like Norway and the UK either.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Im just saying that Europe needs to make it clearif it really gets problematic on the American side that they will step in as a backup. I get the drama and suspense helps bolster the morale of all involved and motivates increased participation/giving but its a little disheartening that we have to play these games for every stakeholder to get their house in order and start making gurantees to bolster the faith and morale of the Ukrainians themselves

BTW, you side-stepped the suggestion on individual NATO members not meeting their agreed-upon commitment of 2%(GDP) per annum, can you speak more specifically to that allegation?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And I'm saying that Europe is already doing that. Europe is not the backup because most of Ukraine's aid is coming from Europe. America is a very large contributor and therefore important, and it has the biggest military industry to turn towards production, but to say that Europe "needs to stop playing poor and open their very dusty checkbooks" when Europe is already significantly outspending Ukraine's other supporters only makes sense if you've just never looked at the actual numbers

I didn't side-step the bit about individual domestic military spending commitments because I'm not looking to argue that part. 10 European NATO nations are meeting it this year. The others should do what they said they'd do, but it wouldn't actually help Ukraine unless we're all sending actual troops in.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They should just pledge and give the shortfall and then everyone's happy.

I get you don't want to discuss that because its a problem with regard to your thesis. Just because Europe is giving more comparitively, doesn't conflict with the reality that they are still not meeting their NATO funding commitments on the basis of 2%/GDP.

Now maybe the US or at least the US government doesn't really care about that anr chalk it up to a cost of doing business as the world's policeman and dominant hegemonic actor, but let's not get in a pissing match or dick-measuring contest about who's ponying up more when certain parties aren't even meeting the baseline level of that which they freely and voluntarily commited to (even if thats on the part of EU as a bloc as opposed to individual members)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

let’s not get in a pissing match or dick-measuring contest about who’s ponying up more

literally your entire presence in this thread is dick-measuring about how europe isn't doing enough

I get you don’t want to discuss that because its a problem with regard to your thesis

No, it isn't. My point is that Europe is giving more to Ukraine and that while the European NATO members should meet the 2% commitment, doing so would not actually help Ukraine. If you want to have a general discussion about Europe's defence capacity then sure, have fun somewhere, but I had figured that since you commented on an article you were commenting about the article

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, I think thats a bit disingenuous. I am commenting more about how ridiculously beholden the viabillity of this entire effort (supporting Ukraine's war defense) seems to be on the participation of the US (in terms of financial backing) and its vulnerabillity to the US' internal political machinations when Europe should be underwriting and guranteeing this for the most part and anything the US provides should probably seen more as the "sprinkles" or a cherry on top.

Zelensky has certainly portrayed it as such (US blocking more funding == existential threat to Ukraine), and I'm not criticizing him for putting on that show because ultimately I think it will help in many ways but I sincerly hope their troops (to the extent they are in any way aware of what is happening on the larger world-level) are advised that they are going to be fine and morale is not affected by the soap opera aspect to all of this

Edit: its so goddamn sad the West needs a damn fairtyale to entertain ourselves sufficiently for us to drop $1/€ in the hat😤

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

You ain't wrong this should be EU problem first but EU has no capacity for it at this point so they should be using this opportunity to fix that.

America is getting tired of running global security.

If EU is a partner, they should be acting like one.