this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
497 points (97.3% liked)

Greentext

4765 readers
1501 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 137 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (28 children)

Claims to be in the American wilderness

uses Metric

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Unlike with longer distances and temperature, Americans don't strictly use imperial for shorter distances (m, cm, mm). It's on all of the signs and stuff, but we learn metric in school as well as how to convert to and from. In university-level physics classes, they almost solely use metric. So as an American myself, I didn't bat an eye at him using meters. But if they said that it was 30C outside...

[–] Classy 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It helps that meters and yards are very similar in size. Of course they drift as the distances get larger but in my mind 300m is a pretty reasonable thing to visualize. Just a tad larger than 300yd—about 3 football fields (Inb4 stereotype)

Km though? I still struggle to compare it to a mile. When someone says "50km" my mind has a hard time imperializing it. What's that, like 35 miles?

Maybe memorizing how the km lines up with the mi on my car speedometer would help.

[–] azulavoir 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

think fibonacci sequence and you're in good shape

34 comes before 55, then 3 comes before 5, so 50 km is (55-5) km = (34-3) mi = 31. It works shockingly well

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is so incredibly much complicated to me than just multiplying or dividing by 1.6.

And also 55 km is 34 miles, not 31. I had to run it through a converter tool just to be sure.

Edit: I reread your comment. The goal was 50 kilometers. Then the math checks out. Sorry!

[–] azulavoir 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

just multiplying or dividing by 1.6 is about as accurate as my strategy in the other direction - the real value is almost exactly between them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I guess as long as it works it works. I don't have to do much of those conversions though. Here in Norway we are metric in almost all of our measurements. Except for some specialist measures like a carton of eggs is a dozen. We often say things happened a fortnight or so ago, etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)