589
Wake-up Call: Democrats could easily lose the White House and Senate next year
(www.businessinsider.com)
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
589 points (93.9% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2526 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you support biden, you are the scum bag.
Billions for bombs on Palestine, zero money for student loans.
I will never forget. And I will never vote blue again.
And that's wrong. But it's better than a Trump presidency giving x10 the amount.
It wasn't zero. Biden was still able to get some borrowers off the hook, just not as sweeping as necessary.
And you're ignoring SCOTUS's part of this.
Which is the exact type of decision that will lead us to another round of election lies, social safety net destruction, defunding of education, and corruption.
I'd rather haven Biden than live in Gilead.
Biden cuts a check for genocide
Dem voter: better than trump, better than trump, better than trump, better than trump.
You should get this tattooed on you.
No I'm including the flaws in the supreme court as apart of a large flawed structure that you insist I buy into and support.
I saw exactly zero money for student loans from biden, so that's how many votes he will get from me.
Bringing this up again and again doesn't help your argument when I've already addressed it.
Have you run out of arguments, leaving you with mocking as your last resort? Or do you have an actual argument here.
For you it was zero but it wasn't zero as a whole like you're trying to pretend.
Biden ran on debt cancellation, not a debt forgiveness of loams already eligable for debt relief.
This did nothing for me and thus I will give biden nothing.
Do you? Your only argument is better than trump.
You deserved to be mocked, your playing into the same lesser of Two evils logic they were using with George W bush.
You said it was zero but it wasn't.
On basically ever single issues Biden is better than Trump I'm at least some way. That's about as good as it can get in our two party system.
You're just using ad hominems. And it shows how dogshit your arguments are.
And yet everything still sux.
You: Would you like to eat dog shit or chicken shit. ?
Me : I don't want to eat any shit.
You: you must choose chicken shit or we will have to eat dog shit every day!!!!!
Me: What if we found something other than shit to eat?
You: better than dog shit! better than dog shit! better than dog shit!
You're not understanding. Everything sucking is better than everything being made intentionally worse.
Fixed it.
You have not found something better. There are three options:
Cardboard
Shit
You waste your vote and have to eat shit.
So why you think picking number 3 is the best option is beyond me.
Biden is not cardboard in my mind. It is not acceptable or palatable at all.
It's actually really funny to me that you decide to make this choice. To purpose biden is not chicken shit but instead cardboard.
The fact that you look at biden and the genocide that he is directly helping commit, and see that as acceptable, Says a lot more about you than me.
You are a genocide apologist.
Or in other words, carboard.
Dude, cardboard is not acceptable. I never said it was. I have explicitly told you that the current situation is not acceptable.
Dude I am so close to getting banned from c/conservative for saying Isreal's genocide is bad. You've got it backwards.
Then why are you accepting it?
A vote for biden is support for him to continue doing what he does. How do you not see that ?
While I can appreciate that. ( although its probably a waste of time) It doesn't absolve you from what your doing here.
You are actively pushing people to vote for a party who absolutely supports the genocide. They are the ones in power now. They are the ones who cut the check. There is always nuance, but there is no watering this down.
Biden supports genocide , you support Biden.
You support genocide.
I'm not. I'm specifically voting against it where possible.
Not really. A vote for Biden is a vote against Trump.
50 is bigger than 5. So I'll vote for 5.
I'm aware it's largely a waste of time. That's why I do it at work when I'm trying to kill time.
The democratic party is split. That's not good. But in comparison the republicans are at nearly 100% support for the current genocide, plus they are cool with a second one in Ukraine.
Both sides are not equal here.
I don't support Biden. I voted against him in the primaries. I hate his policy just as much as you do. You can vote for a politican without agreeing with 100% of what they do.
I'm doing what I can to reduce the impact of this country's terrible politics. And that start with making sure the least bad politician is the one that gets in, because doing nothing means the worst option (Trump) gets put in power.
I could just as easily say you support genocide.
You support Trump. Trump supports genocide. Therefore you support genocide.
Bruh you already forgot lmao
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-11/student-loan-debt-biden-forgives-127-billion-bringing-borrowers-relief
Through making changes to programs, after SCOTUS rejected his larger plan, $127B in loans has been forgiven.
This brought zero relief to me. So thanks biden for nothing. Nice gotcha tho.
Ah yes, because as we all know, the only thing that matters about politicians is their direct effect on Discoslug's personal well-being, other people be damned...
I guess your not including Palestinianz as people?
Pretty on point for a genocide supporter.
How about women then? Because guess who isn’t trying to end reproductive rights? One guess.
This isn’t even on the national level. We just voted here in Ohio to enshrine them into the state constitution, and wouldn’t you know it, the state legislature immediately responded by openly expressing their intent not to abide by the will of the people. Who makes up the majority (~70%) of the legislature here? Again, one guess.
By the way, I also had a choice on the ballot for who is on the board of education. One was a right-winger. The other was… also a right-winger, and an avowed member of Moms For Liberty. Maybe anyone on the left who was qualified for the position thinks like you, that nothing important gets done at the local level. [I voted for neither because, unlike you, I literally had no choice, it was a one-party vote] So now we have two more people on the school board who can and will work to ensure that kids learn the virtues of slavery, “traditional” family roles at the exclusion of all others, the nonexistence of people who are not 100% straight, and so on. But I’m sure that you’re cool with that because none of this pertains to genocide, the ~~most important~~ one solitary issue that matters in our lives. Guess we should stop caring about all that.
If someday my daughter is consigned to be a brood mare in the Dominionist Theocracy of America, don’t expect me to salute you because you “don’t support genocide”, you fucking hero.
This has nothing to do with your previous point, I'm just saying that it's ridiculous to judge a politician's performance based on how you personally as an individual benefitted from their policies. Like, we can take the labor wins, and the child tax credit, and the infrastructure bill, and appreciate that even though some of us didn't directly benefit from these it's better for society overall.
I didn't mention the conflict at all, where did you get this from? Would you like to be an adult and maybe ask what my position is before making such a bold assertion that has nothing to do with my previous statement? You're too mad to see the forest for the trees, dude.
This guy has no other arguments. They appear to have just one problem personally affecting them, which is student loan debt; otherwise, they’re fortunate enough to be able to care about one other issue and no more than that. That’s why they’re okay with the possibility of Trump winning because none of his policies will otherwise directly affect them. Must be a charmed life.
So if you don't personally benefit, it doesn't matter? Don't expect others to care about you if you only care about yourself. Because Biden not forgiving Discoslugs student loans isn't a problem to me, nor anyone else here. I don't see why that should factor into my voting decision or anybody else here's.
Like how you are caring about the Palestinian people being genocided rn? by voting for the guy who approved money for their ongoing genocide.
I could ask you the same question.
Fewer Palestinians are going to die under Biden than Trump. Do I wish the number was 0? Yes, absolutely. And I'm really disappointed it isn't. But there's still a choice to make here that'll save Palestinians who would be otherwise killed.
If 10,000 more Palestinians would die under Trump than Biden, and you don't see that as enough reason to vote for Biden, what does that say about how you feel about those 10,000 people?
There's a very easy way to tell the difference between someone paying lip service or using a tragedy as a weapon, and someone who actually cares about the issue. The person who cares doesn't stop when 0 deaths isn't achievable -- they keep working to make the number as close to 0 as possible. And with this context, when the options are to vote for Trump, Biden, or neither, I think the choice is fairly clear.