this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
284 points (90.6% liked)

News

22839 readers
3703 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SpaceX’s Starship rocket system reached several milestones in its second test flight before the rocket booster and spacecraft exploded over the Gulf of Mexico.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 207 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I really wish they'd stop putting Musk's name on things like this. He didn't design the engines, he didn't plan the flight path, he did nothing but throw a bunch of money at a company because he's obsessed with Mars.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He does force them to cut corners for the sake of more headlines though

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Which is why I'm nervous for when they decide to start doing manned flights.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Falcon 9 is the most reliable rocket in the world and it used to explode like this too. It’ll be 5-10 years of successful unmanned flights before anyone rides on this rocket.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And what of worker safety at Space X?

Reuters documented at least 600 previously unreported workplace injuries at Musk’s rocket company: crushed limbs, amputations, electrocutions, head and eye wounds and one death.

It's not the rocket or the engineering I'm concerned about, it's the push to meet deadlines at the expense of safety.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You literally said you were concerned for manned flight in your last comment. So originally it was the rocket and engineering you were concerned about.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I said I was concerned because of the corner cutting, which isn't an engineering problem

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That might’ve been what you intended but it is not what you said. You didn’t bring that up until your 2nd comment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

You literally said you were concerned for manned flight in your last comment

You're oh so slightly twisting the dude's words. What he said was:

Which is why I'm nervous for when they decide to start doing manned flights.

This could be expressing concern about the flights themselves, or about something that happens around the time the decision to start doing manned flights is taken - like cutting corners that leads to employees getting injured.

Dude even clarified what he meant, and you're like "nope, I won't accept that"?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

The US government has a pretty good track record on making sure astronauts don't die.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Blame the poster. The CNN article itself doesn't have Musk in the headline and barely mentions him at all (there is one quote near the end).

EDIT

Or maybe don't blame the poster. From the URL and web archives, it appears CNN may have changed the title.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/18/world/elon-musk-spacex-starship-launch-scn/index.html

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Perhaps it’s time for titles that match the article headlines as a matter of policy here?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Actually, I just realized the poster may have used the original CNN title.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

That is precisely what happened. I use the title that gets pulled when you paste in a URL.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That is already the rule. CNN changed the headline after I posted it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

… throw a bunch of money at a company because he ~~’s obsessed with Mars.~~ wanted to justify sending money to some Russian arm dealers friends.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

what? didn't he start SpaceX because Russia WOULDN'T take his money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

IIRC, they wouldn’t take his money because he misunderstood the price they wanted, tried to bargain it down and lowball them, and ended up pissing them off so much they doubled the price.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

He tried to buy Russian decommissioned ICBMs but the DoJ wouldn't let him.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

He did insist they slap an X on it tho. Thats gotta be worth something, right.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Sadly, Thats how capitalism work hence they keep using Musk's name. Anyone with money is valuable in our economy.