this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
201 points (95.5% liked)

World News

39332 readers
3115 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

America is distracted, the UN is not interested

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (10 children)

America is distracted

Ah, being America; you're the bad guy when you interfere in other countries and you're also the bad guy when you don't interfere in other countries. The same people criticizing America for not doing anything today will turn around and start criticizing America for what they did, no matter what it was, if they get involved tomorrow. Everything you touch is your fault and everything you don't touch is also your fault.

Maybe, just maybe, America shouldn't be expected to insert itself into a Sudanese civil war. Maybe, just maybe, Middle Eastern and African powers should come together to deal with humanitarian crises in their own region and America should be, at most, a partner providing assistance only if and when requested.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The problem is they always meddle for the wrong reasons. Nobody would be bothered if they helped in humanitarian ways.

Mostly it's been:

  • Cause civil war to put up a corrupt dictator that will let them pilfer the countries ressources

  • Occupy the country themselves and pilfer the ressources while ignoring the needs of the population

  • Fund Israel or the Saudis brand new corpse making machine.

So ya, the US probably should help because they can and it's morally the right thing to do, but they shouldn't help like they "helped" Bagdad.

[–] assaultpotato 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's not true. Tankies love to shit on the US for "meddling" in Africa when a lot of the time its providing funding and weapons for regimes where the opponents are funded by Russia/Wagner/China. Depending on which way the wind blows, the US is either "overthrowing a legitimate regime" or "restoring the democratic process".

It's a no win. Africa is too weak to stabilize by itself after centuries of meddling, and if the US goes hands-off, Russia and China will just economically enslave them via predatory loans, like how neoliberal policies economically enslaved South/Central America to the US. I'd trust the US installed people for their own populace over Chinese/Russia installed people, given the respective human rights records of all involved.

Anyways, while 2003 onwards was a huge fuck up and absolutely abhorrent, Desert Shield/Storm was incredibly justified defending an ally under armed occupation and still gets shit on by Tankies.

One man's humanitarian mission to shut down a warlord is another man's mission to overthrow a regime and install US-friendly government.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

2003 onward was shit, but before that with what they did in south and central America was pretty shit too. They also always fund the group that will let them grab the ressources, it's never about which group has the best moral position or what's best for the local population. There's better ways to help than funding a civil war, wars that are usually orchestrated into being by them anyways.

Being against American imperialism does not equal being a tankie and I resent the implication. Not everyone that disagrees with you is a tankie.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)