this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
339 points (96.7% liked)

News

22869 readers
4261 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Senior men have higher rates of suicide than average, and firearms were involved in more than three-quarters of those deaths in 2021, according to a CDC report

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't say it was the guns fault. Even if we fixed a boatload of societal problems, guns still don't help these situations, and you'd still have people using them because they're available.

The idea that they don't contribute to the problem is laughable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They do, but they are not the root cause, and focusing on them is a distraction.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's not a distraction though.

The vast majority of attempted suicide survivors regret ever trying. They get help and live better lives.

When someone is in a bad state of mind or having a depressed episode that is the time when they are most vulnerable.

Having easy access to an immediate life ending device with the squeeze of a trigger is a major problem.

This is the reason jump nets and barriers work on bridges. Making it slightly harder or more inconvenient to kill themselves saves lives.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

As someone who lives in the UK where only farmers can get a gun to protect livestock from dangerous wildlife( which hate on me all you want is a valid reason to own a firearm and not just as a fancy toy to show off like Americans). Statistics show that men tend to use more brutal methods of suicide so not having guns makes no difference because they will simply use a different fatal method. So as someone who lives in a country that has a lot of suicides and no guns for the average joe. Removing guns has solved nothing in terms of suicide.

So please draw info from other countries before making assumptions about how a law would change your country, because otherwise it's very narrow minded, and you will waste time and lives trying to make a solution that already has no effect abroad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

As someone who lives in the UK where only farmers can get a gun to protect livestock from dangerous wildlife( which hate on me all you want is a valid reason to own a firearm and not just as a fancy toy to show off like Americans). Statistics show that men tend to use more brutal methods of suicide so not having guns makes no difference because they will simply use a different fatal method. So as someone who lives in a country that has a lot of suicides and no guns for the average joe. Removing guns has solved nothing in terms of suicide.

So please draw info from other countries before making assumptions about how a law would change your country, because otherwise it's very narrow minded, and you will waste time and lives trying to make a solution that already has no effect abroad.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Its not a distraction -- it's an immediate, measurable solution to a growing problem, that absolutely nobody is suggesting is the entire solution.

Meanwhile, what have the pro-gun groups that insist they (and they alone) have the solution suggested?

Video games. Marilyn Manson. Rock and rap music. Not enough prayer. Too many doors. Abortion. Legalised weed. Women. Drag Queens and gay marriage. COVID vaccines. Critical race theory. Not enough people having guns.

And what a surprise, every single one of those excuses is just blatantly something they want to attack anyway, using the "look what you made me do" excuse loved by manipulative abusers everywhere.

The boomers blame popular culture. The fundamentalists blame secularism and abortion. The fascists blame minorities. The neoliberals blame their donors not making enough money.

After 25 years of offering nothing by distractions, some marketing genius thought of "mental health", which is at least part of the problem.

But of course their take away isnt "clearly we are not mentally healthy enough as a society for such permissive gun laws", nor even "we should do something about the mental health problems are facing".

Instead, it's "Other people should build a mental health system that is mandatory for every man, woman and child in America, even if they don't want help. It has to cure mental health problems, even those beyond our ability to treat, instantly and so completely that they will never relapse, even for a second. Also, we are going to obstruct your efforts every step of the way politically, legally and by telling children they're less important that inanimate objects used to kill and oppress people".

Because the idea was never to fix the problem, the idea was to create something that would distract people for 200 years, so the money would keep rolling in.

But don't worry if the skepticism has already started to creep into your brain with intrusive thoughts like "does this mean we train soldiers to be mentally ill?" or "are they trying to say that being a right wing reactionary like most mass shooters (and gun owners) is actually a mental illness?"...

MTG has already come out and blamed mass shootings on the medication we use to treat mental health problems, ensuring gun owners still have the backup distraction of "too much mental healthcare", ready to be used the day people meet their impossible prerequisites for gun control.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago

typical “buh muh guns” response