this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
565 points (98.8% liked)

You Should Know

32162 readers
3 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'll spoil this for you, much of the time they didn't even read the medical documentation sent to them, just denied whatever was asked for. And then hoped the patient would drop it and never even let their doctor know it was denied. Or if that fails and the doctor finds out it was denied they hope the busy doctor wouldn't be able to figure out how to contact the company and the right number to do so, navigate phone trees and find archaic long series of ID numbers and case numbers and other information specific to that one company, then schedule a time range of hours, often in the evening at home, to be ready to answer a call at any moment from some "peer" (who's not actually a peer, a doctor, or even in the same specialty) who also never read the medical documentation sent. The doctor points out to the company the rationale meeting all their criteria is clearly met in the medical documentation. But the "peer" states their company has a new additional rule about that treatment and that wasn't included in the initial documentation sent. The doctor points out it was, the "peer" claims they don't have it though. This is followed by another denial. That additional documentation is sent in again, no response for weeks (please allow up to 4 weeks for response). After finally getting a hold of someone, they state that they can't accept this since there was already a denial and now must go through an official appeal hoping the doctor won't know how to find out about their seperate and distinct appeal process. If the doctor figures out how to do that then they hand write a letter again explaining the medical rationale for the treatment being denied including citing sources from the literature. But oh wait that appeal was denied, because this was a Medicare advantage plan or some crap and the appeals process used is not applicable to this plan type. But you may file an appeal with the state insurance authority. And it goes on.

Anyways, three months and much unpaid labor later, treatment finally approved. Which, if they had just read the original note sent, should have been approved in the first place. Not speaking from experience here or anything, lol.