Hardware

33 readers

1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

HUB - Intel Fixes E-Cores For Gaming, Doesn’t Give 12th & 13th Gen Users The Fix! APO Testing (www.youtube.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You think e cores are only for synthetics? What if I show you 6p+6e or 6p+8e can defeat 8p in real world applications?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, applications are definitely getting optimized for 8C/16T as of late so it won't be all that surprising.

Hyper-threaded threads (hyper-threads?) can't match an actual core by design, after all.

However, I'm merely question the addition of 8+ E-Cores in Intel's high-end SKUs. I believe I explicitly mentioned that I can see the potential of integrating 4 to 8 E-Cores into a CPU.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What if I showed you Intel 12th 6p+6e was able to defeat amd's 8p in real world applications 2 years ago?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

A quad-core or - at most - an octa-core cluster of E-Cores should be more than enough for handling 'mundane' background activity while the P-Cores are busy doing all the heavy-lifting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It's perfectly reasonable for high-end SKUs.

You either have single-threaded workloads or games that might use 6-8 threads at most. Or you have "embarrassingly parallel" workloads like rendering or all sorts of scientific computing that will use as many cores as you have.

If you literally only game on your PC then I guess just disable the e-cores.