this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
341 points (97.5% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7633 readers
1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The SCOTUS is illegitimate at this point. Prepare for years of terrible decisions. Or, do what I'm doing. Expatriate. This shit's beyond saving during this lifetime.

[–] FunderPants 14 points 1 year ago

It's been years of terrible decisions. They've been trying to build this Scotus config since Nixon and Reagan years, now they have it and everything people have been making fun of me for saying for 20+ years is happening. Ugh.

[–] Difficult_Bit_1339 8 points 1 year ago

Expatriate

Where are you headed?

[–] socialjusticewizard 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not much better in other places. Lots of us rely on being "better than the us" so as it slides, so do we, just a few meters behind.

Politicians need to actually feel concerned about how the people they are hurting will respond. Currently they know there will be nothing more than a few grouchy news articles and upset social media comments.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except the French. They start a riot for every small change.

[–] socialjusticewizard 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad people have correctly realized that the French should be associated with violent anti government riots and not surrendering. That was a meme that needed to die.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

When you actually study French history for 5 minutes, you realise how the memes about the French surrendering are straight-up ridiculous. And the people hold their government to account far more than most countries.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, they chopped off lots of heads back in the day. Smashing some shop windows and burning a couple of police cars is kind of a slow day for them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

undefined> Supreme

We need to stack the supreme court ASAP.

[–] Djeece 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Biden just said how he's against that because that would be politicizing the supreme court.

Thing is, you can't win by playing by the rules when your opponent is constantly cheating.

The supreme court has clearly ALREADY become politicized, it can't get that much worse than rich white guys buying a black justice to do their bidding, now can it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's not like there isn't precedent for it. Andrew Jackson did it. FDR threatened to do it, but the Supreme court caved to his demands to avoid it. There's no way we're going to let these judges decide our fate for the next 50 years. Eventually we'll get someone with the balls to stack the court. I'd also support term limits, but that would be allot harder to pass as it would require a constitutional amendment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You know who will not have any issue stacking the SCOTUS?

The next Republican president.

The idea is in the table, and the GOP will not hesitate to add two more judges to solidify the court in their favor. This is where Democrats are indecisive and weak. Republicans will exploit any and all opportunities to consolidate their power. Just look at what is going on in Ohio right now.