Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Oh gee, I didnt know that. That sure makes it morally acceptable to kill civilians.
No, that puts Israel in a lose/lose position. They tried lose for a while, but currently they’re running the lose-strategy.
But if you cry out Israel for war crimes, and you don’t do the same for Hamas that makes you a hypocrite.
Isreal is not in a lose/lose situation, as the situation is way more complicated than that.
But Isreal definitely has the opportunity to make things better/prevent them from getting worse. They can stop killing civilians. Every civilian area they bomb ultimately creates more terrorists than it kills. They can stop cutting off food and water, which ultimately feeds into the desperation that feeds terrorism.
There is never a situation that demands the blood of civilians. Yet somehow everybody seems to think it's OK when Isreal does it.
I do criticize Hamas as well. Both Isreal and Hamas are terrorist organizations that kill civilians en mass. Neither of then should be supported, let alone given billions of dollars for "defense" (read civilian bombings).
On the surface this reads like you would be able to reasoning.
But then
Israel is a democratic state (which has chosen an awful leadership in the last three elections or so). By demonizing this as a terrorist organization you’re taking yourself out of any serious discussion.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/terrorism
Fits the bill for a government that is intentionally bombing civilian areas.
If they didn't want to be labeled as terrorist, then maybe they should stop bombing civilians.
This is what the Hamas did on Oct 7.
This is not what the IDF does. Israel is very explicitly telling the civilians to go away. Also in their communication they're very explicitly targeting the Hamas, not all Palestinians. It's the Hamas that uses civilians as shields so that the likes of you can repeat their propaganda of Israel targeting civilians.
But even if the IDF was targeting civilians, that does not make the whole state a terrorist group.
So you're wrong on all accounts.
It absolutely is. They are intentionally bombing civilians/civilian areas to reach their political goals.
Telling people to leave doesn't change that, if anything it makes it worse, as doing so contributes to the spread of fear.
Talk is cheap, especially when your bombs are landing on civilians.
Killing civilians is never morally permissible. And you need to take a deep look at your morality that is allowing you to defend it.
No matter what objectively horrible shit Hamas does, it doesn't matter. Civilians are off limits.
By that logic, Hamas isn't a terrorist group either.
Also:
What are you talking about? Hamas is not a State, it’s an organization with the foundation idea to remove Israel from the map. It’s not Palestine, and it’s not Gaza.
Furthermore I’m not defending bombing civilians, I’m pointing out that your language is that of Hamas’ propaganda.
And I'm not here for semantics.
You're defending Isreal's actions and therefore the bombing of civilians.