this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
581 points (97.2% liked)

Games

16958 readers
482 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What I don't get is what made 2023 the year of the cut brakes? Seems like every corporation has decided to just go full fucking tilt on pushing their consumers to the edge of what they're willing to put up with and they have ZERO shame about any of it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

High consumer spending keeping the economy afloat against the predicted recession that never materialized. Companies figured they could start charging more and get away with it.

[–] nitefox 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Won't that risk to actually start the recession though?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people making the decisions don't care nor will they be affected by one in any meaningful way.

[–] nitefox 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they will earn less money, won’t they?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The company will, but from what I've seen the decision makers find ways to ensure they still get paid just as much or nearly as much, usually by laying people off and screwing over customers even more.

These companies are purely short term focused. They don't look to the long term and they don't care about the company's stability far into the future. It's all about hitting the next financial target no matter what.

[–] nitefox 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but if you enter a recession, your earnings will be much less. Even if you fire most of your staff, you won't earn shit anyway.

So causing a recession seems like a very dumb idea

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with you, but from what I've seen large corporations don't. That's all I can say, and this is all just anecdotal.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Profits going down I guess. People save money when inflation is crazy, and if the company profits go down, their stocks go down also. If that happens, leadership may be replaced etc etc.

Ive cancelled most of my subs because they didn't even provide enough value before the price hikes.

So the people who remain and who are fine with paying YouTube or Netflix, they will have to pay more to support higher profits.

Probably in 2030, people will both pay and watch lots of ads since that gives maximum profits. Pretty much how cable TV went.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an argentinian I find people from the US treating your anual Inflation as if it was doomsday amusing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't use Argentina as a benchmark here haha.

[–] nitefox 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Kurros 7 points 1 year ago

I agree with regards to other studios but, activision blizzard has had no shame for a while, not a new thing at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Higher interest rates put pressure on tech companies to actually not only become profitable but also compete with those returns considering the risk.