this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
995 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Palpatine thinks he is relevant to this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 365 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or what? Is that supposed to be a threat? Seems to me that if a Republican is warning you not to investigate something then it definitely needs investigating.

[–] [email protected] 219 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think he's implying that exposing the corruption will bring to light corrupt Democrats as well.

Which is such a fucking typical conservative concept, as though the party should defend the corruption within by ignoring corruption everywhere. Jokes on you, motherfucker, because we want to expose and eliminate corruption among Democrats and Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This. Democrats are not in a cult. Punish everyone who is doing crimes.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you imagine a congress and SCOTUS that actually acts in the interest of the people?

[–] Bakkoda 56 points 1 year ago

I'm 40 so no, not even remotely.

[–] remus989 16 points 1 year ago

I literally cannot fathom this.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

And the republicans will find something minor and insignificant about a democrat and make a massive deal about it as though they are equivalent issues.

Like Biden’s classified document issue compared to Trumps. Then they say, “See? Both sides are basically the same”.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbf, some Democrats don’t want it exposed, nor will resign when they are exposed. Some will run to their yacht to hide from angry constituents and not face intraparty opposition.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This got me curious if there were actually any recent cases of this...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Also: Joe Manchin.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or hell be forced to stand completely still and silent while definitely not having a seizure.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, those were strokes, not seizures.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But, but, but... dehydration 🙄

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, all his blood dried up into clots.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We call it "blood" but it's really just tar.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You call it "tar" but it's really that alien from TNG episode Skin of Evil.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Is that supposed to be a threat?

"You won't like me if I get... uncivil" is the most Senate threat in the book.

Nevermind that we've got sitting Senators who have body-slammed journalists in recent memory.