Asklemmy

43947 readers

534 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

132

On a low gravity planet, would it make more sense to build habitat domes or habitat sky-scrapers? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Lack of space might be a reason why they exist but it's not the only reason they might be preferable.

How are we feeding people on this planet and what are people doing with their days? If we're trucking in supplies and everyone is working at MegaCorp, you need skyscrapers. Spread out domes are needed if you're relying on self-sufficient kitchen gardens and the main purpose of the inhabitants is simply to survive there.