this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
19 points (62.7% liked)

World News

39325 readers
2253 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s obvious you think Israel are the good guys. And dishonest to pretend otherwise. I support Palestine. Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions.

[–] bernieecclestoned 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There was a chance of a two state solution, a lot of effort was put in, Yasser Arafat is widely blamed for walking away. They chose to continue to commit to genocide. Ironic eh?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/may/23/israel3

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Widely blamed by whom? The West?

At the failed Camp David summit, Arafat was ambushed by Clinton and Barak, when both presented him with a deal that was much more favorable to Israel than to Palestine. Source.

But facts don’t matter to you. Ironic eh?

[–] bernieecclestoned -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The proposals included the establishment of a demilitarised Palestinian state on some 92% of the West Bank and 100% of the Gaza Strip, with some territorial compensation for the Palestinians from pre-1967 Israeli territory; the dismantling of most of the settlements and the concentration of the bulk of the settlers inside the 8% of the West Bank to be annexed by Israel; the establishment of the Palestinian capital in east Jerusalem, in which some Arab neighborhoods would become sovereign Palestinian territory and others would enjoy "functional autonomy"; Palestinian sovereignty over half the Old City of Jerusalem (the Muslim and Christian quarters) and "custodianship," though not sovereignty, over the Temple Mount; a return of refugees to the prospective Palestinian state though with no "right of return" to Israel proper; and the organisation by the international community of a massive aid programme to facilitate the refugees' rehabilitation.

Ambushed with the best deal ever. Sure.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry you typed all that in vain. If you’re trying to convince me, you’re gonna need to grant all Palestinians equal rights, and withdraw settlements from all occupied areas. If you want a 2 state; we go back to the 1967 borders and conditions. Deal?

[–] bernieecclestoned -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a quote... from the link you didn't read

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You comment like Israel negotiates: One-Sided. And then become indignant when the other side disagrees.

[–] bernieecclestoned -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just disagreed without reading the details, there's no point arguing with someone who doesn't know the details

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good luck defending the indefensible. Btw, I did read it.

[–] bernieecclestoned -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet you defend a terror attack where women are raped and children burned alive?

Good luck with that 🤡

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just found out that’s not true. I don’t need luck, I have truth, and the right side of history.

[–] bernieecclestoned -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wow you swallow propaganda without even chewing, GG!

The link in your 'source' doesn't match the claim...

Also by the same author

The Israeli regime was not the victim on October 7. The Hamas offensive bears no resemblance to the September 11 attacks of 2001 and the Palestinian resistance has nothing in common with Daesh or other takfiri terrorists. The only thing that was out of the ordinary for the conflict in Palestine on October 7, was that for once the fight was taken to the Israelis and instead of it being dead Palestinians, it was dead Israeli soldiers and settlers.

https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-israeli-victim-narrative-about-october-7-is-based-on-wes

🤡

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the link. Now I have more propaganda to chew on. Would you prefer I read Ben-Gvir?

[–] bernieecclestoned -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I really dgaf what you do mate