this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
876 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

32191 readers
560 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A few days ago I sent a GDPR request to some company to delete my personal data. They said to install their app and send a ticket from the app. The email was sent from the email address to which the account is registered. Is this even legal?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 424 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

No, it’s not at all legal for the company to do this. Reply and remind them they have one calendar month to comply from the date of your original request, otherwise you will make a complaint to which ever information regulator is correct for the juridiction they’re operating in.

I’m a lawyer specialising in Data Privacy, reply here if you need more help on this one.

Also feel free to name the company.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

Fuck them and bless u lol

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

For now, I do not want to announce the name of this company publicly.

If they don't want to solve it amicably, then I will do so.

[–] [email protected] 168 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They already said they don't want to.

They asked you to install the app on purpose, in hopes that you'll decide it's too much hassle and decide not to delete the account.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago

This is a bad decision, IMO. They may fix it for you, but then you've lost the opportunity to assist everyone who comes after you.

You posted asking the public for help. Please return the favor and report them, as you are legally supposed to do.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Scubus 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Think of the poor corporation! If they get punished for their illegal buisness practices, it'll hurt the economy and people will be less inclined to start a small buisness. Didn't you study piss down economics?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

"WHAT ABOUT THE TRUE VICTIMS HERE! WHY DOESN'T ANYONE CARE ABOUT THOSE HARDWORKING, SALT-OF-THE-EARTH SHAREHOLDERS! ARE YOU PEOPLE FUCKING COMMUNISTS?!"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I guess the company is embarrassing in some way.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Must be something that makes you look bad lol

Otherwise you'd just say it. You owe them nothing and they've broken the fuckin law and you're protecting them? What do they have on you?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or maybe they just want to disclose as little of their personal information, including services relied on, on an open platform like this. Idk if that's the case, but playing devil's advocate here

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I will never understand why people complain online then do this. Why are you being such a pushover. What does amicably even mean to you?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Feetfinders.com? Heh

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That reminds me, I might have to put in a formal complaint for a somewhat similar matter.

Bought concert cards years ago, and was never able to unsubsribe from the newsletter. I sent requests to every mail address I could find, and never even got a response. Still got newsletters every now and then though.

They also just make it unnecessarily hard to contact them, so at this point I'm not sure my messages even reached them, which hopefully is what explains their failure to comply.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depending on country there's probably some regulator office which you can send a complaint to

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

France in that case, so that would go to the CNIL. Though they want people to make an account to put in complaints online.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Genuine question: Aren't you supposed to say "this is not legal advice?" if you identify yourself as a lawyer but you're not their legal council? Or am I mistaken?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Look it is the internet, you can rest assured if they say they are a lawyer, then there is no doubt ;)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And I'm totally not a dog. Woof!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I TOO AM A CANINE UNIT. I LIKE EXECUTING CANINE BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES SUCH AS RETRIEVING ITEMS FOR MY DESIGNATED HUMAN OWNING UNIT. WOOF.

[–] leavemealone 5 points 1 year ago

HAHA WELCOME FELLO CANINE UNIT. PLEASE REMEMBER TO DO UPGRADE X1.90 IMMEDIATELY TO PERFORM BETTER SERVICE TO THE ~~SWARM~~ HUMAN MASTER YOU SERVE.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I AM OPERATING WITHIN NORMAL PARAMETERS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That one is certainly illegal, misrepresenting yourself as a lawyer online and giving legal advice on that basis. Same for doctors.

[–] Klear 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Klear -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And you are certain the poster aboves lives there because...?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"because...?" ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I can't decide if this is written jokingly or seriously.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

The purpose of that disclaimer is for the lawyer to not expose themselves to malpractice lawsuits from OP, which seems VERY unlikely to be relevant here