this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
256 points (97.8% liked)

World News

32363 readers
242 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We were that one time, and we’ve been milking it ever since.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (8 children)

WW2, we only joined because Japan attacked. Otherwise, there were elements of the US population that were cheering for Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We also nuked two cities, for reasons much less honorable or necessary than the one we are told.

[–] can 6 points 1 year ago

You'd think one would have been enough

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

The US has never opposed fascism - Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany were colonialist rivals threatening US hegemony and influence and nothing more.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Prior to Pearl Harbour, the US funded the Japanese as the Japanese committed countless war crimes and genocide in China.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well that and the fact that there was a huge Irish-American population that was hostile towards the UK in ways that I think a lot of younger people and non-historians have really lost sight of because it's not really a thing anymore. The idea of taking sides with the British Empire was a very tough pill for a lot of Irish-Americans, most of whom, unlike today, still had direct connections to Ireland. The famine was no longer really in living memory, but the children of the famine survivors were definitely still alive and influential and they absolutely despised the British for understandable reasons.

History is always way more complex and nuanced than some half-baked one-liner trope on social media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

That was mostly by accident. IMO America's actions in and around WW2 are better understood as the result of two expanding empires bumping into one another (America and Japan)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@davel

We were that one time, and we’ve been milking it ever since.

Only until 2006 which is when the UK finally managed to pay the US back the "lend lease" debt it racked up in WWII

Wonder how long it will take for Ukraine to pay back theirs, they're on a Lend Lease from the US right now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You & I are the only people who seem to know this. Everyone else is busy arguing whether we can “afford” to give Ukraine “free stuff”, when in reality none of it is free, and whatever few Ukrainians are left alive after this war will be paying onerous debt for generations. They’re already auctioning off many public assets to mostly foreign buyers at fire sale prices, up to and including seaports.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's crazy. Ukraine is a fire sale and the debt will be on the US govt books as an asset.

Makes me realise, a lot of things we read in history books that seem cut and dried, were probably not at all obvious to the people who lived at the time because their perception of facts was probably as skewed as our societies' perceptions are now.