this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
119 points (97.6% liked)

Asklemmy

44281 readers
948 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
119
Deleted (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Deleted

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This sounds like something chatGPT could easily convert. Although that is computationally high.

It would also have the side affects of blocking all math illiterate people from creating accounts.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Based on the given statements:

The box is yellow and red.
If the box is yellow, it is good.
If the box is blue, it is unhappy.
If the box is good and happy, the box is awesome.
If the box is red, it is happy.

We can deduce the following:

The box is yellow, and according to statement 2, if the box is yellow, it is good.

Now, according to statement 4, for the box to be awesome, it needs to be both good and happy. However, we don't have information about the box being happy. Statement 5 only mentions that if the box is red, it is happy, but we know the box is yellow and red, not just red.

Therefore, based on the given information, we cannot determine whether the box is awesome or not.