this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
410 points (98.6% liked)

News

22612 readers
5303 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The 17-year-old student government president and scholarship candidate was videotaped dancing at an off-campus party following Walker High School’s Sept. 30 Homecoming festivities. A hired DJ took the video and posted it on social media. Three days later, Jason St. Pierre, principal of the public high school near the state capital of Baton Rouge, told the student she would be removed from her position with the student government association and that he would no longer recommend her for college scholarships.

At a meeting in his office with the assistant principal, St. Pierre told the student she wasn’t “living in the Lord’s way,” her mother said, according to The Advocate. He printed out Bible verses with highlighted sections and “questioned who her friends were and if they followed the Lord,” the news outlet reported.

In a statement published Sunday on the Livingston Parish Public Schools district Facebook page, St. Pierre reversed course. Citing the significant public attention the episode had received and more time to consider his decision, the principal apologized to the student’s family and undid his previous disciplinary plans. He also addressed his invocation of religion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 124 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The rest of the article:

“Finally, during my conversation with (the student) regarding the dance party, the subject of religious beliefs was broached by (the student) and myself,” St. Pierre wrote. “While that conversation was meant with the best intentions, I do understand it is not my responsibility to determine what students’ or others’ religious beliefs may be – that should be the responsibility of the individual.”

The student and her mother said St. Pierre brought up religion, not her. The mother and daughter have also said the deadline for her scholarship application was on Oct. 3, and questioned whether St. Pierre could have reinstated his scholarship endorsement sooner, The Advocate reported.

In a statement Monday, district officials said St. Pierre had requested to take leave for the remainder of the school year.

“Walker High School Principal Jason St. Pierre has requested to take leave for the remainder of the 2023-2024 school year,” said Livingston Parish Public Schools Superintendent Joe Murphy. “The district office is awaiting his paperwork to process his request.”

Fuck this guy for bringing his religion into school administration, and infringing this student's 1A rights with it. Hopefully his leave will become a resignation.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I want to see him fired, not terminated. He’ll probably be allowed to resign, but that doesn’t look as bad on his resume.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (3 children)

My gut tells me that there's some behind-the-scenes going on that we're not aware of. I find it highly unlikely that someone who so brazenly punishes a public school student on religious grounds would reverse course so completely without some more sensible person in a position of authority doing a "U fukn wot m8?"

Somebody grabbed that guy by the collar and told him exactly what he was going to do next: take the blame, apologize, and gtfo.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Probably, still, it’s far more common that religious louts force their beliefs than not-religious people- and it’s starting to get to the point where their beliefs are in fact dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Speaking as a "not-religious-people," when I force my beliefs on people, it's things like "We call people what they want to be called," and "We don't criticize people for things they didn't choose."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

As an atheist, that’s really. It forcing beliefs on others- that’s just common decency, politeness, and good manners.

To force matters, you’re going to have to take a stone or two from their book.

You know, for when they dare where a crucifix. Or dare to check out a Bible from the school library.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the second time in this post's comments that I've seen the idea that the pushing of religious beliefs into politics, into non-religious people, etc, is "starting" to become a problem.

No.

It is a problem.

It is dangerous.

It's the reason for the repeal of Roe v Wade, leaving to such atrocities as a 10 year old child being forced to go out of her home state to abort her rapist's baby.

It's the reason Republicans spent so many decades stacking the Supreme Court in the first place, to get outcomes like the above. Remember Mitch McConnell not letting President Obama appoint a replacement for Scalia? That had nothing to do with the people's will and everything to do with conservative, religious beliefs.

It's the reason so many states are passing anti-LGBTQ laws, particularly anti-trans laws, putting queer people of all kinds at risk of violence, depression, and suicide.

It's the reason so many states are banning books and the teaching of accurate history. Suppression of knowledge carries with it a danger all its own.

There is no "starting". The danger is here. Now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

It’s always been a problem, but it’s getting dangerous. As in, physical violence.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Probably this guy was already on someone's radar and they were just waiting for him to fuck around. Then they let him find out.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

He was on their radar...he was up for Principal of the Year award.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

It's Lousiana, so yes, but definitely not in the way you're thinking

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

The person you are describing is typically the school district or parish’s lawyer.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

He brought up religion; he had pre-printed some scriptures to back up his argument that she was displeasing to God and morally corrupt. Also told her she was going to suffer in her afterlife.

She may have responded to him, but he 100% brought religion into the conversation. By phrasing it the way he did, he was trying to slough off responsibility.

Apparently other students have come forward to say this is NOT the first time he's used his religious beliefs to discipline.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Apparently other students have come forward to say this is NOT the first time he’s used his religious beliefs to discipline.

That was also my suspicion, though I have not read anything about that. Source?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He should be fired, and no retirement package.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It's a retirement or a paid vacation?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully his leave will become a ~~resignation~~ firing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

A public firing with a legal opinion from the district lawyer outlining all the laws he broke and a public recommendation for other districts not to hire him because of his illegal behavior would do nicely

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd bet that there's nothing left to sue for, since the principal walked it back and is going on leave.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's too late to reinstate the scholarship. They could sue for that. Also, the principal just admitted. Suing for 1A should be a slam-dunk.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If she lost scholarship opportunities because of this, absolutely.

If she's still in the running for all the same scholarships, after the walk back, I don't think there would be any "loss" to sue about there, and the walk back itself serves to "make her whole" with regard to 1A. Although I imagine that it's possible that the whole set of circumstances could be argued to have negatively influenced scholship selection against her, and there could still be a punitive aspect. But I think either of those would be difficult cases to win, considering the substance of the walk back and seeking leave for the rest of the school year (at least).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

According to the article, the deadline for the scholarship admission was October 3rd, so she missed out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ah I missed that in this article, and I didn't remember it from previous ones.

Yes, lawsuit should be incoming.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We really need a movement anti religion. Enough is enough. No, i dont want to erradicate religion, I want religion out of day to day decisions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lmao. My friend showed me a TikTok of some dingbat Christian Lady talking about how hard it is to be a Christian since they're being persecuted so much. Like bitch, it has literally never been easier to be a white Christian in the US with how we're barreling down to good ol' theocracy land