this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
123 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43970 readers
724 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Asphalt used on road surfaces are byproducts from fossil fuel. With the ultimate goal of eliminating the use of fossil fuel to combat climate change, are there any good alternatives for road surfaces? I don't think I've ever heard of a viable replacement of asphalt in the works, or even a plan to replace it in any environmental discussions before. At least, not enough for me to notice.

Extented question would be: what are some products derived from fossil fuel that are used in everyday life, but still lack viable alternatives you don't see enough discussions about?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I do like the brick roads they often have in places like the Netherlands. Example

Not sure how they compare in environmental impact though.

[–] falkerie71 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Aren't brick roads bumpy to drive on? It may be fine to put in housing areas where cars drive slow normally, but I imagine it would be a pain in the ass (literally, lol) and dangerous to drive on on high speed roads.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sure, you wouldn't put them on highways. But I'd like to have less of those anyway. They're decent for cycling or driving at lower speeds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

dunno if I'd call it decent. bumps will wear out suspension components prematurely, meaning they'll have to be replaced more often. so more metal and rubber being produced. is it enough to make brick not worth it? idk. also worth noting that asphalt is far grippier than brick. more grip = safer

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think you really overestimate the bumpiness of those kind of roads. They're not like medieval cobbleroads.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We have all kinds in my city: Medieval cobblestone, brick roads and asphalt. As a cyclist I have to tell you that I hate all kinds of brick roads that I have encountered. Even when they're not the horrible middle age version, they will often get deformed by roots or depression of the ground quite rapidly, making them even more bumpy. For this reason I think, I saw in Sweden in an otherwise bricky city center that they had a narrow asphalt lane on the side of the road for cyclists. I was just amazed that someone would spend that much thought into what's great for cyclists. As a cyclist I really love asphalt :D

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they will often get deformed by roots or depression of the ground quite rapidly

That's true, but more of a maintenance issue IMO. Brick roads do have the advantage that workers can just take some of the bricks out, fix whatever is wrong underneath and put the same bricks back on. Can't really do that with asphalt, which will eventually deform as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Asphalt is almost a liquid when it’s hot. That’s a significant advantage in application.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Let’s be real here. Asphalt is the result of tens of thousands of years of human decision making, all of it heavily invested in finding the best solution to each problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think you underestimate how small differences have large results when we’re talking about nationwide or population-wide issues. If there are a million cars on the road and this change makes suspensions wear 5% faster, then every X years (however long it would usually take for them to wear) there are an extra 50,000 cars needing replacements. That’s not an insignificant amount. Scale that up to larger countries that have tens or hundreds of millions of cars and the result gets even larger.

Small differences make large impacts. 1.5°C average global warming is having disastrous effects on the environment and our capacity to thrive. COVID-19 has a Case Fatality Rate of around 1% (depending on country) and it has caused nearly 7 million deaths - more than the amount of Jewish people murdered in the Holocaust and similar to the Holodomor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holocaust total was 12 million, of which 6 million were Jews.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Cheers for the correction - I’ve edited my comment.

[–] falkerie71 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I actually know from watching Formula E, that in order to make their indoor/outdoor track in an exhibition center in London race viable, and would still be able to operate normally after the race, they developed a way to add grip on concrete floors without the use of asphalt.

Article link
YouTube video from Chain Bear on how they made the track

Edit: Link format

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bumpier = slower = safer.

Slower = driving less distance = less wear and tear.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Time is a limited resource

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Consider the fact that you're unlikely to make a trip to the other side of the world if it weren't for the fact that airplanes exist and they cover the distance very fast.

Higher speeds enable different trips to happen - the speed changes the types and distances of transportation that happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Slower = less transportation happening

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cars are the least efficient means of transporting people and make all other means of transporting less efficient. Less cars = more transportation happening.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Not if people need to go to every point on the map, throughout the whole road grid.

But I think we can consolidate vehicles a bit.

Something like electric bikes or segways or scooters for the last mile helps cover the entire grid.

And we could have double the number of buses, maybe with demand-based scaling of bus lines (no doubt they already do this but I bet it’s on the scale of months instead of hours).

But those other forms of transport don’t provide privacy, and we really like the privacy of a car.

The turbo lift from star trek is a cool idea. Just a room you stand in that takes you wherever. That provides some privacy.

I think more fundamental than the logistical aspects of it, the main hurdle is that sense of owning the space you’re traveling in. In my car I’ve got a thousand little tweaks I’ve made.

Maybe each person could have a vehicle configuration that gets loaded up into the generic shared vehicles, so when they get in it feels like theirs, has all the same things ready.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...No they are very smooth. I think you are thinking of cobblestones.

[–] falkerie71 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, I may have. I admit I have never driven on brick roads before (cobblestone roads yes), so more input on people's experience and long term observations with these would be great.

Do you think it's viable in situations like high speed driving? Other potential problems?