Minnesota
About Us
We are community-driven and dedicated to celebrating the diverse and inclusive spirit of Minnesota. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or simply fascinated by the Land of 10,000 Lakes, you'll find a warm and welcoming community here. Our goal is to foster meaningful discussions, share local news and events, and create a safe space for everyone to connect and engage.
Rules and Guidelines
Be Kind and Respectful: Treat others with empathy, respect, and understanding. We embrace diversity and encourage civil discourse. Personal attacks, hate speech, discrimination, and harassment will not be tolerated.
Stay on Topic: Keep your posts and comments relevant to Minnesota. Let's focus on discussing local issues, events, news, and culture.
No Spam or Self-Promotion: We love to support local businesses and initiatives, but please refrain from excessive self-promotion or spamming. Posts must provide value to the community.
Avoid Sensationalism: When sharing news articles or stories, please provide accurate and reliable sources. Avoid clickbait titles or exaggerated claims.
No Illegal Activities: Do not promote or encourage illegal activities or engage in any discussions that violate the law.
view the rest of the comments
It's not about shoplifting.
That's not the kind of targeting they're talking about in the article at all. According to the article, Target provides a lot of funding to the police and other government functions in Minneapolis. They also provided some rather suspect "expert testimony" that linked an innocent child to a crime based on the pants they were wearing in a Target surveillance video. Target also teamed up with Minneapolis police to maintain a list of 100 predominantly black at risk youths so that the minor crimes of those youths would get more severe prosecution and punishment to make sure they ended up in jail for minor offenses instead of receiving the housing and support they needed to stay out of prison.
Yes, I'm kind of torn on this because making a list of kids for police to focus on can definitely lead to harassment and being charged with more serious crimes by association or by reputation in the absence of evidence. But compared to the typical policy of waiting until shoplifter has racked up felony levels of theft, prosecuting smaller crimes could have a less negative impact on life than a larger more permanent conviction. Not sure what was actually happening here though because the article doesn't have many details.