1235
Fax (i.imgur.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

Leaving them on the streets is also more expensive than housing them.

When they're on the streets, it means the government must pay for emergency services, extra sanitation work, police are called more frequently, etc.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

True. I should have said "saving money".

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Do you have a source for that? I can't think of a more perfect rebuttal to people saying that we shouldn't pay for their housing, but your claim is pretty bold, so being able to back it up with something would be good.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

A chronically homeless person costs the tax payer an average of $35,578 per year. Costs on average are reduced by 49.5% when they are placed in supportive housing. Supportive housing costs on average $12,800, making the net savings roughly $4,800 per year.

http://endhomelessness.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Cost-Savings-from-PSH.pdf

Studies have shown that – in practice, and not just in theory – providing people experiencing chronic homelessness with permanent supportive housing saves taxpayers money.

https://www.npscoalition.org/post/fact-sheet-cost-of-homelessness

Without connections to the right types of care, they cycle in and out of hospital emergency departments and inpatient beds, detox programs, jails, prisons, and psychiatric institutions—all at high public expense. Some studies have found that leaving a person to remain chronically homeless costs taxpayers as much as $30,000 to $50,000 per year.

https://www.usich.gov/resources/uploads/asset_library/Ending_Chronic_Homelessness_in_2017.pdf


This obviously varies from state to state. But generally it is cheaper to fix the root of a problem (housing) than a symptom (emergency services), and that applies to homelessness.

But even if it wasn't a better option from a purely cost/benefit analysis, the moral thing to do is to house the homeless. So no matter what, it is something we should be doing.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Of course it's the moral thing, but some people would disagree, hence there being value in being able to prove it's cheaper. Thanks, I'm saving your comment in case I need to prove this to someone else in the future :D

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
1235 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

4668 readers
3494 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS