this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
1050 points (96.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53370 readers
687 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

$25 to rent the movie, one watch within max 24 hours after you start watching it... Or $5 more to own it. Scammers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 143 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Spending $30 to own a brand new movie that just came out is not something I have a problem with.

However, not being able to download a copy of the movie you purchased is where I take issue.

[–] Oneandonlyzach 72 points 10 months ago (3 children)

$30 to own the movie is valid, but for $5 less, you're only allowed 1 watch within 24 hours of starting. Something like that shouldn't be basically the same price as the movie. With pricing like this, they basically force you to spend the extra $5. There isn't even a point to rent the movie and they know that.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When you said “cheaper” I was not expecting like NEARLY HALF THE PRICE

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Yeah. I'm back to buying discs for the movies I want to support. Then I can always hang on to a copy no matter where it might live on streaming apps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The 4K Blu-ray is 25 pounds, which is 30 USD. So the same price. But with the Blu-ray you actually own the disc.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

I absolutely agree! Renting a movie should cost nowhere near as much as purchasing the movie.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That pricing is only to drive more people to buy it than rent it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If you don’t get a physical piece of media that can be viewed offline indefinitely, you don’t own anything, you’re just renting. Services revoking even bought and paid for content is not unheard of, digital purchasing gives every streaming company the ability to do that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you don’t get a physical piece of media

It doesn't have to be physical

/pendantic

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Would be rad if a service actually let you download a movie you purchased as an mkv file or something. Can't see it happening though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yep companies love DRM!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

They are legally entitled to do so, sure.

Doesn't make up for the false implication that you are "purchasing" the movie in any commonly understood meaning of the word. And if there was any alternative where you own a full res digital format, maybe the outrage could be said to be misplaced, but there isnt, and it's not.