Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics.
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I'm not the OP but I can understand both sides. The first 3/4 or so was great. Good plot, great characters, pretty sweet science. Then at the end... all this jazz about love. It felt like they didn't know how to end the story.
Additionally, if you're a big sci fi nerd like me, the ideas of
all of that has been done before. I mean shit, in Star Trek
spoiler
people lying to be rescued from an awful situation, the earth becoming uninhabitable, decades passing in minutes and everyone you know dying or getting older...spoiler
both Picard and O'Brien have lived decades or lifetimes in false lives only to return to where they left from and been expected to resume living as if nothing happened.There have been so many great minds creating new ideas in sci-fi for years. It's really difficult to make something really unique that's also good.
Interstellar is a good combination of several old ideas and a clever take on some of them, e.g. the robots. The "love" bits get too much hate. The movie is sometimes misrepresented as saying love is some all powerful force, when it's really just saying love drives people to do the the right thing, and steering you should to some extent let love set the your course.
It's a pedestrian idea, for sure. I see it as a bunch of techno-nerds coming realizing that interpersonal relationships are a necessary for success as their knowledge of physics.
I see the love thing as creating a kind of resonance, such that things that resonate together are drawn to one another, and can sync up.
That's how, when he's inside the event horizon, he can jump to the right moments to create the effects he needs to create. Those moments "resonate" with him, and the love between his daughter and him is that resonance.
My interpretation is more prosaic: future humans built a device he'd be able to use. Love just gave him the drive to figure out how to use it.