this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
550 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

60116 readers
2603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Engineers at MIT and in China are aiming to turn seawater into drinking water with a completely passive device that is inspired by the ocean, and powered by the sun.

In a paper appearing today in the journal Joule, the team outlines the design for a new solar desalination system that takes in saltwater and heats it with natural sunlight.

The researchers estimate that if the system is scaled up to the size of a small suitcase, it could produce about 4 to 6 liters of drinking water per hour and last several years before requiring replacement parts. At this scale and performance, the system could produce drinking water at a rate and price that is cheaper than tap water.

https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(23)00360-4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Article doesn't mention what the unit does with the salt waste.

I support this 100%, but desalination presents a unique problem: what do we do with all the salt? Maybe the unit uses it for something, but otherwise it just miniaturizes a problem that we're already working on.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If this works, it's better than anything we have , which costs grid energy and dumps brine all the same. If anything, the smaller scale makes it easier to distribute and dilute the output brine.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (14 children)

If sea levels rise as much as they're supposed to, this will be an invaluable tool for an enormous proportion of the country. My concern comes from capitalism getting its hooks into this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Wait what country?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Which country are you referring to?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Evaporate it to solid, store it if need be, or distribute it back into the sea in absorbable chunks. The water's ending up back in the sea eventually anyway, see water cycle, so it should be zero sum, just need to avoid local overloads. Seems eminently solvable.

[–] Corkyskog 20 points 1 year ago

Depending on the desalination method, you can also harvest lithium while your at it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds so easy for you but what to do with the excess salt is the only real problem with desalination that we have for decades now. It's not easy to solve.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's only the second part of the problem too. The first part is how do we stop the salt from building up inside the device?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Eventually is an important word here. With the raise of temperature, the amount of vapor in the air raises too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hehe, adorable chunks..

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don’t you just dump it back in the sea? Diluting should make this a minor issue right?

[–] starman2112 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

That's what I always thought, but the local effects of hypersalinated water can be terrible for any nearby life

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is mostly a scale dependent issue. The size of this unit means it’s probably not a concern unless you ended up making thousands of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Create some sort of Dead Sea salt bath / salt therapy place where people can float in the saline waters or something for cheap. Then flood a converted parking lot with the saltwater and dry it off for ~~rusting cars~~ deicing roads on the east coast.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats the big ecological question. If we do this at scale, we'll be releasing more briny water back into the sea than we take. Over time on industrial scales, what will this do to the oceans? Is the increased salinity negligible, even at large scales? Or will it cause marine wildlife to die out?

Think of it this way. Burning a pile of wood generates CO2. So first burning a bunch of gas or coal. A couple campfires won't make a dent on the atmospheric composition. It's only when we go this en masse and at industrial scales that we add appreciable CO2 to the atmosphere and cause global warming.

The ideal way to handle desalination would be for us to use the salt that's produced, so the concentration in the ocean remains unchanged with respect to desalination.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the water is all being returned to the ocean rather quickly. It’s not quite the same with CO2.

There’s some localized issues to deal with, but it’s not going to be a global salinity increase as we aren’t changing the form of the water and storing it, like the polar ice does.

So in fact, the ocean should already be desalinating slightly from the melting ice caps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I thought about the ice caps, yeah. It's just something that warrants long term monitoring and observation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Fellow Frenchman detected.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... can't you just put i straight back into the sea?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Suitcase sized device? Only one or two of them nearby? Then that's not a problem.

If you scale it to industrial sizes/quantities then the extra salinity in the area where you dump the waste products becomes an issue.

Eg my coastal city uses about 135 megalitres of water a day. Supplying all that from seawater requires you to put about 5 metric tons of salt somewhere, every 24 hours.

Stick 5 tons of salt a day directly in one place in shallow waters just offshore and you'll end up with a dead zone a mile wide pretty quickly.

So now you've got to water that salt down into something that's only slightly saltier than usual and that can be difficult because for my example 135 million litres of water a day, you want to dilute the waste by at least 10x that (to make it approx 10 percent saltier) and now you're cycling a billion-plus litres a day around the place.

So this is pretty cool stuff, but just need to be careful with the side effects when it's scaled up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I understand it such "waste salt" is usually returned to the ocean in the form of brine. The brine is denser than the ocean water around it so it flows down the slope of the land like a river into the deeps where it eventually dilutes back into the ambient water.

Brine flows and brine pools happen naturally in some places in the ocean already. They're common underneath sea ice - sea ice is pure water and brines flow out of it as it forms. There are brine pools in the depths of the Mediterranean because that sea has greater evaporation than it does fresh water inflow. It's not some new horror humanity is inflicting on the ocean. If care is taken with routing the brine it shouldn't cause much trouble to the ecosystem.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It's already a problem in some areas. It's the scale that we do things at that causes the problem.

CO2 also exists in large quantities by natural process, but when you increase it on a massive scale for a century, it adds up to disaster.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Suitcase sized device? Only one or two of them nearby?

About as many as there are people living nearby.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And guess where all that water ends up?

It's a closed circle so if you don't transport the water far away it should just go back to the sea.

Also the sea is kind of large...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's not about the global or countrywide scale. It's about the local scale. If you take a cup of salt and eat it, it's going to end back up in the ocean eventually, but it'll make you sick before it gets there. Dumping salt into an area is going to screw with the ecosystem in that area, in a major way. We actually have similar problems in many areas due to stuff like fertilizer runoff from people's lawns during rainstorms, causing toxic algae blooms in ponds and around beaches.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's able to successfully reject the salt waste, which is a success. The question will be if it can reject enough of it.

The brine itself though is a really good question. I think there's some existing uses for it, but we'd probably need to think of new applications for it as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think the unit dumps it back into the surrounding water. I don't think this will replace large scale reverse osmosis, but if it can produce enough for a couple people and not require external power, replacement filters, or frequent maintenance, then it's has potential use for costal communities.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just toss it back out in the ocean or make lots of jerky.

load more comments (6 replies)