this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
65 points (97.1% liked)

Games

16821 readers
431 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO
65
Ubisoft's XDefiant Delayed After Being Rejected by PlayStation and Xbox - IGN (www.ign.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/games
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Ubisoft could potentially launch somewhere between the middle of September to the middle of October after being denied certification by PlayStation and Xbox.

In a written update, producer Mark Rubin said that Ubisoft started the certification process for XDefiant on PlayStation and Xbox at the end of July. However, in mid-August, Ubisoft found out that the game received a Not Pass. If it had passed, then XDefiant would have been released at the end of August.

Now, Ubisoft has to search for compliances and functionality bugs within the game and fix them so that it can ship. Ubisoft plans to submit to first party platforms for certification again in less than two weeks. If the game passes, then it can officially be released by middle to late September.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like, seriously? How bad does a game have to be to fail from such a major Publisher?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea I'd expect something like that from an indie developer that's not familiar with the approval process

Why would they submit if they weren't sure if was going to pass lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ubisoft is a big company. I can see it as the devs saying "it's not ready" and some exec, high on his if you believe hard enough it's true bullshit and said either submit it or find another job.

Maybe they thought their checks cleared?

Or, it's a security violation. Maybe the game accidentally opens a door to allow unsigned software to run.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Best comment here. Either exec (with overconfidence or deadlines), or security violation seem most likely. Surprising that it's for both platforms though...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I've never played Cyberpunk, but watched my husband play for a lot of hours. I played Xdefiant's beta for a day in June. I'm puzzled by why it didn't pass. Beta was not buggy, had maybe one minor issue with it. My guess is security violation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I can't even play Borderlands 3 on my ps4, it crashes repeatedly and is completely unplayable. Somehow this garbage made it past the quality control