this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1086 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38255 readers
2168 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 68 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (40 children)

Capitalism naturally ends up in this position. That's why it's so hard to "fix" -- to those at the top, nothing is wrong.

[–] Hanabie 10 points 11 months ago (31 children)

It's not regulated properly, that's the problem

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (29 children)

But those regulations are constantly labeled as "anticapitalist" -- because they are.

Why is it so wrong to poke at the inner workings of capitalism? Why must it be infallible?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because the people benefiting from its brokenness aren't ready to stop salting the earth for numbers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

...I think you may have misread my comment.

I'm saying it's broken and asking why it should be accepted as infallible.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I thought they were just agreeing with you, FWIW

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

You're right - but I can see how the tone was interpreted as oppositional, I could have worded it differently to direct that more clearly. No harm afaik, lol.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)