this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
529 points (98.2% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2529 readers
42 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

[email protected]

[email protected]

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

    “We don’t have any way of taking care of a dog,“ an officer told the dog’s owner, Bryan Pennington.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Training and pushing cultural changes EILL change this. And yes, officers that break the law should go to jail, and that too with make change. But you can't expect untrained people to behave correctly and make correct decisions. Of court they won't because they don't know how.

[–] sentient_loom 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but nobody needs training to not murder a dog. Only punishment will work with these kinds of psychopaths. They didn't kill the dog because they lacked training. They killed the dog because they enjoy murder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mmm, assuming that not all police officers are sadistic asshats, I imagine many of them just being scared and only remember being told to shoot first, ask questions later. Training and changing the culture within police organizations will do a lot there. Also punishment

[–] sentient_loom 1 points 1 year ago

These particular officers are the only ones who would be punished for killing the dog. Also, they weren't under attack. They just decided they'd rather kill the dog than to not kill the dog.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mmm, assuming that not all police officers are sadistic asshats

Serious question: Why would you assume that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For the same reason I assume not all gays are pedophiles. Only really really dumb people think like that. Know better, be better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That has shit to do with either math or reality. If you're ubhad a job where you were the breadwinner for your family you might understand that things aren't always that easy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's ubhat? And whatever makes you imagine someone who disagrees with you must've never held a job?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"If you ever had"... mobile phone sometimes messes up writing.

And it's not because you disagree with me, it's because you're saying dumb stuff. Generalizations like that are always wrong and yes I see the irony in that statement.

There are more than rnot police officers that see the problems and have little options to do something about it as real life kinda saddles you up with things like responsibilities for wife and kids... Life is not black and white and it's very easy for you to make these bold claims while not knowing the real reasons for so many police officers not to speak up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know "the real reasons for so many police officers not to speak up." Do you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oohh, you have access to magical knowledge, you were able to peer in each and all of their heads!

This is a highly complicated subject with probably hundreds of factors influencing decisions of individual officers and large groups, and solving it requires no doubtedly a lot of work, time, money, structural reorganisations, cultural changes, training...

But I'm sure you know better because you know that there is a single reason for all of it! You know that it is something along the lines of "ACAB", amirite?

Complicated problems do not have simple solutions. I know that "defund the police" is a popular slogan, it's als dumb. You NEED police. You just are stuck with very shitty police, but defunding it, or just saying acab is not going to solve anything