this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
200 points (89.7% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7645 readers
20 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If so, was it polled somewhere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. If you can interact with and debunk the sources I've provided you and if you can provide first-hand sources such as official government papers detailing the CPCs sterilisation plans for Uyghur women, detailing how they plan to forcibly sterilize Uyghur women in order to eradicate their population.
This would be comical, since the Uyghurs are one of the fastest growing populations in china. So somehow they would both be performing sterilisations and still having the population grow. Someone must've messed up.

Now is there any way I can convince you to interact with the sources provided.

[–] JohnDClay 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

official government papers

What government? It seems like the website you cited disregarded sources because they were from governments. Do you need Chinese government documents specifically?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes. Just as I would need us government papers if I were to prove the us government is deliberately committing a genocide. Now what can I do to make you interact with the sources?

[–] Quacksalber 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No problem buddy, let just quickly break into that one chinese government archive where they got all their nasty stuff, should be easy ;^)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great, so you admit that all you have are the sources previously provided and the inherent flaws they contain zenz We're operating from a point of agreement, then! We do not have strong evidence for the claims being made.

[–] Quacksalber 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

my dude, just because you can scour the internet for 20-30 articles that support your psy-op, while out right dismissing anything even tangentially related with main stream press as biased, doesn't mean you have a point. It only means you've successfully created a bubble around you. Get outa here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

We don't outright dismiss them you dip. We engage with your sources and show why they're unreliable or non-factual. You're the one handwaving sources away and refusing to engage any further. Talk about a bubble around you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fact of the matter is that if a genocide was happening there would be evidence of it, but there isn’t. If anything on the order of what’s alleged in these sorts of threads were happening it wouldn’t even be possible to hide it. There would be tens of thousands of refugees flooding into neighboring countries at the very least. Instead, you can literally go walk around Xinjiang and see Uyghur people happily living their lives, or if you don’t want to do that you could watch any of hundreds of videos of other people doing that. Every Muslim majority country in the world sides with China on this issue, and only the US and it’s lackeys (countries famous for their deep concern about the rights of Muslims) are making hay about it.

[–] JohnDClay 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except all the evidence your ignoring because it's from western sources

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Western sources never make shit up. I heard that Iraqis are throwing babies out of incubators and hiding WMDs.

[–] JohnDClay 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you can throw out all western sources out of hand?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you can’t. I said they never make anything up, you’re actually morally obliged to believe anything they say.

[–] JohnDClay 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you were obviously being sarcastic, so I thought you are advocating the opposite.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t immediately discard anything from western sources, but I do give them appropriate scrutiny, and I don’t take baseless allegations from them without the appropriate level of the verifiable evidence as gospel, especially when they have clear geopolitical motivations for their claims. They’ve lied far too many times to be extended the benefit of the doubt.

[–] JohnDClay 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fair enough. I hope you apply the same reasoning to other sources like Russian, North Korean, or Chinese sources?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally no one is quoting the DPRK as an authority on things other than the question of "what is the DPRK's official line?" and mundane questions of policy and economic growth.

But Hexbear mostly deals with liberal rags, it just does so with some level of cynicism.

[–] JohnDClay 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You trust them on their economic growth figures? Those seem the most exaggerated documents I can think of.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Have you ever even looked at them?

[–] Quacksalber 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is evidence for it, you just claim that it is all a fabrication. Just one I found after seconds of searching. Have fun debunking over 60k accounts of mistreatment. https://shahit.biz/eng/

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I just flipped through all 60,000 of them real quick and I gotta say, looks fake and made up. Since it only took you seconds to decide that this was bulletproof evidence of genocide, it only took me a few seconds to determine its fake.