this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)

Reddit

13659 readers
2 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if I buy this. /r/videos was the first sub to go dark early and hasn't been brought back. If the admin were really going in and forcing subs to open you'd think they'd start with the sub that started everything and actually got coverage. Not some random subs.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It could be the smaller subs for precisely that reason. /r/videos is high-profile, and is likely to kick a fit, so smaller subs would be a better testing ground, to see what the reception is, before steamrolling the others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Start with smaller subs and then the bigger ones lose momentum and support too. I also wouldn't put it past reddit to use astroturfing and bots to change the overall vibe and make it seem people are against protests, but it seems like people are addicted and dumb enough on their own and want it to stop. The "malicious compliance" ones are still generating traffic and being active on reddit so this is already compromising that is defeating the purpose too.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago

If I were Reddit, I'd first target subs who aren't able to fight back well. Then, after I've proved that I'm serious and not bluffing, I'll go after bigger subs. This is why many subs are allowing submissions again. In their sticky posts, they often mention that Reddit isn't bluffing.