this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
74 points (97.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35016 readers
895 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've had an organ donor card in my wallet for as long as I can remember and I've always made it very clear to my loved ones that I want all my organs to be used when I die.

My question is, given that I only need one kidney, would it be better if I were to donate the other one right away rather than after my inevitable demise?

Obviously, my organs won't be used in the unlikely event that I die in some unrecoverable way, like being lost at sea or something. And there's always the possibility that a close relative might need a kidney at some point, so I should arguably save it for them.

Is there some other reason to do it now?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 119 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You’ve got 2 kidneys. You generously give one to someone in need.

You have 1 kidney. You now have a single point of failure, where you had redundancy before.

IT guy here, just in case that might have gibt unnoticed.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

ah, but[^1] if you donate a kidney you go to the top of the queue

you're losing one when you don't need one, and receiving one when you do

insurance salesman here[^2], just in case that might have gibt unnoticed

[^1]: to the best of my knowledge

[^2]: obviously not

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

But it won’t be your own kidney and you will have to take drugs to try and stop your body rejecting it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Source? When they proposed to do this for blood donors, it got shut down in a hurry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

of course they do: they've only got one kidney, so it's more important for them to get a replacement quickly

alright, i was being facetious. a cursory search [says(https://healthmanagement.org/c/icu/news/organ-donors-who-need-kidneys-go-to-top-of-transplant-list) this, but it's the states only, and i have no idea if it's true or not. i imagine not, but i don't know

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you read the articles you linked, you’ll notice some specifically fishy language. Neither one says that donors are promised first dibs, only that they often get it. If it’s not written down, you have nothing if they decide to do it differently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

i know. like i said, i don't believe it

^i^ ^was^ ^just^ ^trying^ ^to^ ^be^ ^funny^ ^:^ ^(^

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm guessing you didn't manually insert those footnotes, how did you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lemmy supports two footnote formats

the basic type like so:

comment body here[^1]

[^1]: and the footnote at the very bottom of the comment

or the easy to write type

comment body here^[and the inline footnote]

(note the different locations for the caret)

keep in mind that they don't work on most apps, and some frontends

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very cool, thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

no worries, here's the actual documentation. apparently there's a third syntax that i never use as well

[–] Kerfuffle 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You now have a single point of failure, where you had redundancy before.

On the plus side, someone else gets to continue existing.

Or from the IT perspective: I have two important servers, one has a single drive, the other has RAID mirroring. The drive in the first server fails. I could take a drive out of the server with RAID and have two functional servers or I could keep the second one running on its RAID and have a server with redundancy (that hopefully/might not be needed).

(I'm not going out and donating a kidney though, guess we can say it's because I'm selfish.)

[–] Mnemnosyne 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But as OP points out, someone will get that kidney eventually anyway. So the difference is that a different someone else gets to continue existing.

[–] Kerfuffle 4 points 1 year ago

But as OP points out, someone will get that kidney eventually anyway.

OP erroneously thought that but it's not actually correct. The conditions where someone dies but their kidney is viable for a transplant are rare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Counterpoint: If you're an IT guy, you're probably making enough money that you can donate mosquito nets and save tons of lives, and it's not worth risking all that to save one more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless you're running RAID 0 (stripe), then you'd lose everything by pulling one of the drives.

[–] Kerfuffle 9 points 1 year ago

I don't recommend using RAID 0 for kidneys.