sh.itjust.works Main Community

7766 readers

1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

358

Hey could we defederate with exploding-heads.com/ (self.main)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by chalkman to c/main

483 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The instance seems to be mostly right wing trolls. I know defederating is unpopular but I don't think much is to be lost in this case and it can save the mods some headaches.

Edit: the response on exploding-heads.com to my reporting of transphobia. Courtesy of the "second in command"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I got no idea of you're fash or not, but you are clearly acting in bad faith. Trying to apply the paradox of tolerance to someone using the paradox of tolerance? Not denying the place your defending is awful, but instead trying to say quarantining it is bad for reasons? Trying to suggest that viewpoints completely divorced from reality are completely valid?

Mocking shitheels is a great passtime, but engaging with someone who lies about the basic facts of reality is nearly impossible. A COVID denier, just to bring it all back around in a single comment, will just deny evidence has any merit. Look at the latest trans freak outs, again to keep it to a single reply, it's 'people' objectively lying and claiming kids get surgery when that doesn't happen.

[–] goat -4 points 2 years ago

No. I'm clearly not a fascist. I'm quite the opposite, in fact, I'm staunchly democratic.

I'm acting in bad faith? No, I'm not. I'm actively engaging with you, I'm not shutting you down or refusing your points or values.

So many misuse what the Paradox is, I blame American politics. The paradox of intolerance clearly states;

I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies ; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force ; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument ; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law

My entire point is that if users come here from outside their safe-spaces, we are free to engage and challenge their bigoted views. Will it change their opinion? Perhaps, Daryl Davis believes so and from experience, so do I. Regardless, at least it will show to others how outdated and stupid these views are. Do you agree with me on that?

When their claim is easy to disprove, then disprove it. If they say that it's fake-news, then it only makes them look like an idiot.