this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
141 points (80.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43970 readers
666 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Telegram is just actually superior in terms of features I don't get it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Why does anyone choose Telegram or WhatsApp over Signal which is encrypted and audited? (Probably features I don’t care about, but they do)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Telegram let's you send 2gb files, and stores them forever. Signal has a 100mb limit.

It also used to be easier to set up on multiple devices at the same time, but I believe that Whatsapp and Signal have improved that by now too.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not sure the file limitations are much of a factor when 100mb covers most files that would need to be sent through a messaging service. There are plenty of dedicated services for sharing larger files.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mentioned it because it was an annoying limitation for me. 100mb is not a lot for media and zip files nowadays. And I don't know any good free services that will work more conveniently than simply sending with Telegram, suggestions welcome.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

https://toffeeshare.com/ is what I usually use for big files. But both sender and receiver need to be online for the whole transfer. It doesn't store anything you send on their servers, but that's a feature for me Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Piracy tho. I can go to my telegram, search a movie title and click play and it just works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the file size is under 2GB I guess, which is ehhh

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

4GB if the sender was premium, which they will be.

I don't care if its 720p if it just works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbh I'll want it to be decent 1080p

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s the point tho, it negates the need for dedicated services for sharing larger files

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not use an encrypted service to send files though?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
  1. It's encrypted, just not E2E encrypted

  2. A lot of the time the files i'm sending are game clips or parts of Youtube videos. i want good quality above privacy

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Signal is based in the US. Better to use something that is not based in the.US.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as your messages are end-to-end encrypted, I don't know why you would care about that. It's proven that they do not collect any metadata that could harm your privacy and most of their stuff is open source. The signal protocol is a pretty solid protocol supporting E2EE. There are not even cloud backup options, so your messages can never be read from someone other than you and the receiver, unlike something like iMessage that has cloud backup option that backups your messages stored locally on your device probably in plain text to iCloud.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

It takes just one FISA court order to compromise Signal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been using Signal for a long time now, it was great until they ended SMS text support, then they started trying to turn Signal into a social media thing, I just want end to end encryption without having to worry about somebody like Zuckerberg having access to my texts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Was going to post this :3

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

does signal have multi device synchronization? on telegram you can start to write a message on one device and continue on another.

one of the feature i use most on telegram is saved messages to send stuff between phone and pc.

this is pretty much the only thing that is keeping me on telegram.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree that signal is superior in terms of privacy but a lot of people don't care about that. And most people using WhatsApp DEFINITELY don't care about that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This undermines your whole original post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

WhatsApp uses the same encryption schema as signal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh so we should only care about good and secure design when end users care about it!

Because you clearly can’t read the room that was sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I never said you shouldn't care though??