Patient Gamers

11586 readers

223 users here now

A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

^(placeholder)^

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

BurntWits

157

Is there a game that you've been very patient for, which turned out to be dissappointing when you finally started playing it? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/patientgamers

244 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally there are a few games which left me very dissappointed, after hyping myself up for years in certain cases.

Divinity Original Sin: turns out I prefer more streamlined, less packed games (love Pillars of Eternity) and that coop play in a CRPG stresses me out.

Wasteland 2: I actually managed to finish this one but secretly I admit I was hoping for a better Fallout which I didn't really get. New Vegas did the cowboy theme much better.

INSIDE: while the design was cool, it was just a ton of boring, easy puzzles in comparison to LIMBO, its predecessor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Atomic 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Fallout 4....

I was patient on it. Mostly involuntary, but patient still. It was incredibly disappointing. So many amazing features from 3 and NV was gone. Speech is a joke. So you want to agree, agree but be an ass about it, disagree, or disagree and be rude about it.

Those are your options in every single encounter.

It's a good RPG game overall. Just not a good Fallout game.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I was coming to this thread to answer the same. New Vegas was probably my favorite game of all time, with it's unique charm and creative blend of stories and character mechanics. I couldn't make it past 5 or 6 hours of the FO4 (I really wanted to give it a chance), before I dropped it for good. Bethesda wanted to make an action shooter with a twist, and they did a good job of that, but it lacked the creative "it" factor that made me sink 600+ hours in NV across multiple playthroughs. Just talking about it makes me want to boot it back up right now!

[–] abraxas 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ironically, this is my "I don't get why everyone is so disappointed in it" game. I have more played hours in Fallout 4 and Skyrim than I do any of the earlier games in either franchise. Don't know why, and it's not that I came into them recently. I have nostalgia for the others, but I just can't be bothered playing spreadsheet simulator even against Mr. House.

With F4, I know I can dream a build and it happens, even if as I reach higher levels the builds start to blend a bit.

Also, I used to work in the Institute Building, which is placed on the squashed Boston map NOT at MIT, but at the office complex called the Arsenal.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Sorry, between the wine and your reductionist overview I have to respond.

Unless you want to fondle their balls, lick their butthole, or just fuck off and 69 with yourself, agreeing or disagreeing are essentially the only options one is given in conversation. Or you could just listen and not reciprocate, but that's not interactive.

If you want something deeper or more varied just hit up ChatGPT.

I played F3, NV and F4 and I don't see anything so lacking in F4 that I have to return to the previous games. It definitely wasn't limited to "I agree", "I agree, you clod", "I disagree", "I disagree and you smell bad" as you seem to make it out to be.