this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
599 points (98.7% liked)

Games

16830 readers
891 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally have no problem with the monetization, but the balance is really, really bad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really don't need another subscription in my life

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So don't? You get the new hero like a month or so later then. I haven't put a dime into ow since I bought it. You don't need the cosmetics. Let the dumb whales fund the game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you played OW before? I can't imagine a hero which wasn't OP on release, fuck that game and it's P2W subscription

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Picking lifeweaver at his release was widely considered throwing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but honestly I don‘t think it ruins the game. Sure, it’s not the best idea, but I don‘t care too much. I actually care more about the fact that the gameplay currently sucks and is completely different to Overwatch 1. 5v5 and the overall balancing sucks.

[–] zalgotext 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The balance of OW2 is way better than OW1 though. OW1 was a boring shield-shooting simulator for the last 2 or 3 years of it's life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not the balance, that's the gameplay. There are still balance problems like the era of Mercy damage amping.

And while they've solved the CC and barriers problem, they've made teamfights too swingy. With only 5v5 and a single op tank, teamfights are often basically over after a single death or a single Rez. Especially for the tank. That's just too much pressure, so nobody wants to tank anymore.

[–] zalgotext 1 points 1 year ago

Shields were too strong in OW1, so much so that the meta revolved around having two shield tanks. How is that not a balance issue?

I agree there's too much pressure on the tank currently, but I'll definitely take that over the problems 6v6 OW had.