Linux

8120 readers

1475 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

It’s True, “We” Don’t Care About Accessibility on Linux (tesk.page)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I never thought I’d be this upset to a point I’d be writing an article about something this sensitive with a clickbait-y title. It’s simultaneously demotivating, unproductive, and infuriating. I’m here writing this post fully knowing that I could have been working on accessibility in GNOME, but really, I’m so tired of having my mood ruined because of privileged people spending at most 5 minutes to write erroneous posts and then pretending to be oblivious when confronted while it takes us 5 months of unpaid work to get a quarter of recognition, let alone acknowledgment, without accounting for the time “wasted” addressing these accusations.

I beg you, please keep writing banger posts like fireborn’s I Want to Love Linux. It Doesn’t Love Me Back series and their interluding post. We need more people with disabilities to keep reminding developers that you exist and your conditions and disabilities are a spectrum and not absolute.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TriflingToad 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I read the whole article and I'm still kinda confused what the "we" in the title is referring to.

Also and addition to the 'non disabled people pushing for accomodations even when it isn't needed then not listening to the disabled people' conversation, /s should only be used when the sarcasm isn't obvious.

The entire r/fuckthes sub is autistic people saying how it ruins jokes then non autistic people saying "nO iTs FoR pEoPlE wItH aUtIsM" and saying the sub is ableist and its so annoying how they won't listen to the very people they're claiming to fight for.

Not to say I think /s is useless, it definitely has a place when sarcasm is iffy, a good example is making fun of conservatives where people might think you're serious.

Also the /hj (half joking) one is SO infuriating because there's 2 halves and one of them is a joke but it doesn't say which one. It's never really been an issue for me personally, but it's a bad system that gets on my nerves.

I'm not sure if I'm putting my thoughts into words well enough to get my point across without sounding like an asshole.
idk I just have some controversial opinions on tone indicators that's minorly annoying to me and thought this would be a good place to share.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

For me personally I cannot externally observe how obvious my sarcasm is, so I always use it just in case. Plus on many platforms you can spoiler the /s anyways.

the earth is flat

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's not what I thought /hj meant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I've always considered it to be such that the whole thing is simultaneously a joke and true (haha jk, unless?), or maybe just hyperbole. But I've avoided using it myself because clearly it gets misinterpreted way too frequently