this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
424 points (98.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4134 readers
158 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Claiming there's no kettle on a british carrier is peak non-credibility.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The claim is the aircraft carrier didn't come with one included though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I believe all British combat vehicles are required to have full tea making facilities internally. I'm honestly not sure if it's extended to warships or not. It would be remedied VERY quickly however, if not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I would imagine so, IIRC fr*nch (🤢) warships all have bread making facilities on board

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

The British one came from WW2. German snipers realised that British tanks would stop for tea. At the time, they had to get out to make it. Newer tanks then required internal tea making facilities, so they couldn't be picked off by snipers.

The french bread thing also says something about the culture.

Fyi, the French were terrifying in war for a long time. It just happened that the last 2 big wars had them in a bad position.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

That's classified information

load more comments (2 replies)