this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
87 points (96.8% liked)
Open Source
37702 readers
21 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've used LaTeX, Markdown, and Typst extensively. So far as I can tell, the only benefit this currently has over Typst is that it can output to HTML, And Typst is currently working on that.
Math formatting in LaTeX is awful compared to Typst. Markdown and quarkdown just copy LaTeX's math formatting.
On the readme for quarkdown, it compares many of the popular typsetting software (QD, MD, LaTeX, Typst, ...). It says Typst has a higher learning curve than QD. I would argue that this is only true if you're expecting LaTeX. If you have any experience with programming, this is just not the case.
In the demo, it shows examples of scripting, and running calculations in the document. Comparing how to do scripting in QD vs Typst, these have the same result:
Typst:
QD
6
The syntax for doing math is just more concise with typst.
This is an interesting project, but typst will remain my preferred typsetting software.