this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
238 points (98.0% liked)
[Moved to Piefed] Television
1247 readers
17 users here now
Welcome to Television
This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.
Other Communities
Other Television Communities
A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.
Rules:
-
Be respectful and courteous to all members.
-
Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
-
Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
-
Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
-
Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
-
Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags. ****
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We all love to dunk on reactionaries, but there is no final right way to interpret media.
According to "death of the author" literary theory, any reading that can be backed up with the text is valid. These valid theories may contradict each other and even the author of the work. (please don't confuse multiple valid readings with silly relativism that any reading is as good as any other, that's a straw-person argument).
Death of the author is valuable and useful. This is how many classic media have been reinterpreted to take on queer readings for example.
Fair enough. But thinking Homelander is the hero is a good sign a person is a sociopath.
It's important to let them tell on themselves though
Amazing user name
everyone can have their interpretation.
It's just a Rorschach test.
Is someone sees homeowner as a hero, that person is likely dangerous
Homeowners be monsters, y'all.
Homeowners are aight. Landlords, however, are the monsters.
There's no definitive right way, but there are definitely definitively wrong ways